Damn. I gotta be the one to think of EVERYTHING around here? Geeez! Uh, ever heard of Under Armour? Duh. And, you know, maybe a little talcum powder in the more “sensitive” areas.
Well, hey! There you go! No worries about any copyright infringements. WE spell it correctly, and there should be no problems. Oh, and as for the “bondage” outfits, what’s the big deal? Cog walks around here like that all the time. Nobody seems to have a problem with it. (Well, except maybe for when he “forgets” to remove the rolling pin. )
And your lack of belief is precisely what would make this work! Do you not see that? If you, as a member, do not believe it, then it would be an INSPIRATION to others to not believe it. And that is the whole point of our mission, isn’t it? To spread the Word of Disbelief! To help others to fully BELIEVE IN their disbeliefs! You’re a GENIUS! Great plan!
Well, dressing like that would in fact be quite dreadful in winter conditions, with the snow and ice and sleet and all. I prefer warm clothing, so no thank you from me too.
Nawwww… It’s a ploy to get me to release my rolling pin. You can’t bash me in the head with your Butt Pug, I know you don’t want to dent it. Cog’s no dummy.
“The Irreligious Belief Revisionists”… The I.B.R… … I LIKE it!
Ladies and gentlemen, we have a WINNER! The non-blessed vision our Brother Blue was undivinely given has provided our non-faith disbelief ministry with a title that will go down in History as the most mediocre atheist non-religion the world has ever seen! Brothers and Sisters, this is our first step toward near-immortality! And now that we have a suitably profitable name for our Sacred Church of Disbelief, let the bickering over dictates and dogma begin!
Brassiere??? I just wanted to show you what you look like walking about with that damn pointy hat. At least if you put a tassel on it, like the ones on the brassiere, it would be functional.
Actually, I don’t get it. Being irreligious means “neglectful of religion: lacking religious emotions, doctrines, or practices // indicating lack of religion”. So it’s either the belief in the lack of religious belief that is being revisioned (meaning the revisioning of an effectively positive statement of the belief that the lack of belief is the correct one), or the non-religious persons’ revising of religious belief (which does not really make much sense to me). There are probably other interpretations as well.
Excellent, excellent… This is what I like to see. Hammering out the details. Good healthy debate without the constipation of closed-mindedness. We are starting strong as a group. A solid team! But as the debates become more involved, we will soon be splintering into multiple different sects, each with its own ideology and unique disbeliefs, spreading The Word far and wide! Yes, together we are strong, but apart we shall DIVIDE AND CONQUER! AMEN! (Or maybe we should say “Nema” instead. )
WE spell it correctly, and there should be no problems. Oh, and as for the “bondage” outfits, what’s the big deal? Cog walks around here like that all the time. Nobody seems to have a problem with it. (Well, except maybe for when he “forgets” to remove the rolling pin. 
)
Being irreligious means “
)