Surely that is a false statement.
For example: are you familiar with the “shoddy paper criticism”? Perhaps you could outline this criticism for us?
It is hard to understand how someone in the modern world could believe that considered each of us has probably met 100’s of people who deny evolution. There are 100’s of members of AR who deny evolution.
It is hard to imagine how this isn’t trolling.
Nowhere did I say that man produces photosynthesis. Oxygen is required to cleanse the cells. Photosynthesis is required in oxygen. Especially the algae that produce photosynthesis, they produce photosynthesis and as a result of the respiration they do in humans, we cleanse our cells through the coronary vessels.
The human body is evidence. If there is evidence of matter X, there is no doubt. There is no doubt about what has been scientifically proven.
Aren’t we a little haughty… every criticism? Sure buddy.
1 Like
It doesn’t say invisible mermaids don’t exist either. Why would it?
You are again posing an unfalsifiable concept of a deity and implying the illogical and fallacious assertion that not being able to disprove something lends it some validity.
I don’t know how many times I have to explain that this is a known common logical fallacy called argumentum ad ignorantiam?
If you’re not a dishonest person then why are you repeating a claim I have indicated is based a known logical fallacy, and why are you not acknowledging that fact?
No you can’t, and that is a very dishonest claim. Go to any major news network, are they proclaiming science has evidenced a god? No they’re not, why is that do you imagine? You’ve been taught this subjcetive belief, and are simply parroting it here, but it is nonsense.
Listing scientific facts, and asserting they are evidence for a deity, is not scoentific evidence for a deity.
They may or may not be, what they are not is evidence for any deity.
What objective evidence can you demonstrate for your claim for a miracle?
You said the quote appears in medical books.
If that is true, could you please give us a link to something that contains the quote. If not, could you tell us why you told us something is true, that you know isn’t true.
2 Likes
It’s a very long topic. Let me give a book on this subject. https://www.amazon.com/19-NINETEEN-Signature-Nature-Scripture/dp/0979671590/ref=pd_sbs_3?pd_rd_w=czHt5&pf_rd_p=98101395-b70f-4a52-af63-8fac2c4HrdE02&pYE-8fac2c4H13e02&pYE af34-d63ebe834dec & pd_rd_wg = 0NSVv & pd_rd_i = 0979671590 & psc = 1
I am not making logical fallacy. I’m not saying that science has proven God. Science provides us with data. We can draw a conclusion from there.
That is the very antithesis of the scientific process.
Science does not prove anything, and as history illustrates, our knowledge base and scientific theories are scrapped or modified as new ideas and data arrives.
Two hundred years ago the overwhelming majority of scientists were convinced that Newton’s explanation for gravity was complete. Einstein pondered a fallacy, and arrived at his explanation of space/time. And that theory will likely be modified or scrapped as new discoveries and theories come along.
Science offers the best TENTATIVE explanation based on current data.
1 Like
Photosynthesis only occurs in green plants, where light energy is captured and used to convert water, carbon dioxide, and minerals into oxygen and energy-rich organic compounds.
Oxygen is a product of photosynthesis.
1 Like
How is sperm objective evidence for any deity? Or is this another appeal to ignorance fallacy, a god of the gaps polemic?
Only that fallacy has been pointed out and explained to you…
- Pointing out things we don’t as yet understand, and insisting this evidences a deity, is a textbook argumentum ad ignorantiam fallacy.
- If you use a known logical fallacy, like argumentum ad ignorantiam, then your claim is irrational by definition.
You have used an argumentum ad ignorantiam fallacy several times. Everytime you imply the concept of a deity has some validity, by pointing out that your unfalsifiable concept of it can’t be disproved, this is a logical fallacy, called argumentum ad ignorantiam.
You have claimed science evidences a deity several times. This is simply untrue.
You can draw a subjective conclusion, as you keep doing, that doesn’t make your conclusion scientifically valid.
Why has the entire scientific world missed this, and why is it breaking here, and not being trumpeted globally by the entire theistic and scientific world?
The claim is risible, that’s why?
2 Likes
If the Quran proves a god, I would be observing Ramadan at this very moment.
2 Likes
Well I can’t claim I’d worship any Abrahamic deity, but if sufficient objective evidence were demonstrated for any deity I’d accept the claim was true.
1 Like
Yeah, I would too. It’s the honest thing to do, or would be. It’s not our fault that these claims never come with convincing evidence.
2 Likes
@JoelInbody You do not know my back-story, here is a short synopsis.
I was raised in a very theistic family. At approximately the age of 19 I left organized religion because I wanted to be closer to my god, not partake in what I perceived as nothing but social functions. For the next forty plus years I searched for a god, or creator, something spiritual to latch onto. I did it all, even prayed late at night on my knees hoping for a “sign”.
I started to watch Youtube videos, which helped me to organize my thoughts, and eventually I came to the realization I was an atheist. I no longer search, but I have never closed my mind to the possibility that some supreme entity is out there, somewhere.
2 Likes
Thank you for sharing that. I was raised in a Baptist church and later Pentecostal church, and I also searched for god for a few years, not as long as you did, but long enough. I was around 16 when I stopped looking. I don’t really look anymore. I don’t see the point.
3 Likes
Hey.
I have a question for you, I was a Christian close to 90% of my life. Have any objective evidence which proves your god correct and the one I use to believe in wrong? Or what if the Christian god is somehow correct and you are wrong, ever give that any thought?
Been reading your stuff for awhile now and so far have saw you post about the same amount of evidence as I have for some of my beliefs of how there’s nothing after death. I have no (EVIDENCE) to backup my claim that there’s nothing after death. So what objective evidence do you have to prove that your god is even the right one?
I have not seen other Christians give me this evidence either and have had one claim that evolution is only a theory. People who believe in a god will go so far sometimes to even ignore scientific fact with evidence. I mentioned fossils and he claimed that they were not of the same species.
So quite simply put do you have any objective evidence that your god ever existed?
Oh by the way a few years back I went in search of evidence for my god and guess what?, I came up empty handed. Not even Wikipedia lists god as fact but as a belief. Show us objective evidence that your god is correct and the one I use to believe in is wrong. BTW. According to Christians the Muslim ways are satanic and a ticket to hell.
What is your angle coming on here and getting just about to the point of not only discussing the subject but you are near preaching to us as if we’ll suddenly start worshiping the Muslim god?
You do know there’s thousands of religions right?
Can you show me objective evidence that any one of them are wrong for sure? When I start seeing objective evidence to prove any god or deity maybe I will change my position, but if your only evidence is in your Muslim bible I do not want to hear it.
Edit; If I messed anything up here please correct me.
There is little point looking for something which has no (Current) evidence. Science may not be able to prove a god but can not disprove one either, like many others on here have taught me.
My beliefs say that if no evidence has been found yet that means there probably isn’t a god. At least none that science can find but I shouldn’t close my mind to some future evidence. Something could surface in the future but I highly doubt a god will be proved down the road.
I agree with you. There’s not even a trace of evidence that suggests such a search would be useful. All I see is humans and their books.
2 Likes