How unfortunate for you. You’ll find out why shortly.
Oh, you’re in for a roller coaster ride. Buckle up.
Oh, I’m going to have fun with this one. Like I said, buckle up.
Okay, you can try answering the following:
[1] Why are mythology fanboys unable to agree amongst themselves on a global scale, which of our numerous mythologies is purportedly the “right” mythology, and adherents of a particular mythology unable to agree amongst themselves what said mythology is purportedly telling us?
[2] if your cartoon magic man ever existed, why was this entity incapable of stopping the goat herders that scribbled your mythology, from including risible elementary errors therein? Errors such as failure to count correctly the number of legs that an insect possesses, and asserting that genetics is purportedly controlled by coloured sticks?
[3] Why are the assertions about the events in the Genesis creation myth in completely the wrong order, with respect to modern scientific findings? A prime example being the assertion that plants were purportedly “created” by your magic man, before the Sun existed to power photosynthesis?
[4] For that matter, why was your magic man incapable of informing the goat herders that wrote your mythology, of vast classes of entities and interactions subsequently alighted upon by scientists, and placed by said scientists into usefully predictive, quantitative frameworks of knowledge of a sort completely absent from your mythology?
[5] Why do several million peer reviewed scientific papers, point to testable natural processes being responsible for the universe and its contents, without once bothering to reference your cartoon magic man? This includes recent papers from the cosmological physics literature, proposing testable mechanisms for the instantiation of the observable universe and its contents, just in case you’re unaware of this.
[6] The scientific papers I’ve mentioned above, demonstrate that for vast classes of entities and interactions, testable natural processes are sufficient to account for them, and as a corollary, that cartoon magic men from goat herder mythologies are superfluous to requirements and irrelevant. As a corollary, why should anyone familiar with that body of literature waste time with your mythology and its unsupported assertions?
[7] Mythology fanboys assert repeatedly here, that we need their various species of cartoon magic man in order to function as ethical beings. Given that there exists an abundant scientific literature, documenting the evidence for the evolutionary and biological basis of [1] our capacity for ethical thought, and [2] the motivation to act thereupon, why would anyone familiar with that literature need to bother with your mythology and its unsupported assertions?
[8] Why do mythology fanboys routinely and flagrantly violate the rules of proper discourse, when peddling their apologetics for their mythologies, in a manner that is also in violation of various “commandments” contained in said mythologies?
[9] Given that mythology is the least reliable means of disseminating factual information, why would your cartoon magic man bother with mythology as a means of transmitting any purported “message” it had for us?
[10] Why are mythology fanboys incapable of contemplating any other candidate for the “god role”, other than the cartoon magic men from their mythologies? I have a nice example of my own explorations to offer in this post on the old version of the forums, that illustrates neatly the sort of ideas that mythology fanboys seem incapable of entertaining.
Oh, by the way, ex recto apologetics of the sort that would be pointed and laughed at by an astute five year old, or regurgitation of unsupported mythological assertions as an ersatz for an answer, will be treated with the requisite well-deserved scorn and derision.