Oh, hang on, I’d like a piece of this action as well … 
How about your cartoon magic man putting in an appearance and saying “hello” to the planet, in a manner that would be impossible to fake? Possibly including such antics as temporarily relocating the International Space Station, before replacing it back in its proper orbit? Say, arranging for the ISS to take a tour of the developed world at a low enough altitude for millions of people to point their phone cameras at it, as well as TV news crews and radar stations to detect this, while at the same time, your cartoon magic man makes itself visible for the duration while holding the ISS in its hand? That would be pretty difficult to fake.
In other words, what would count as proper evidence, would be:
[1] an observable and measurable phenomenon;
[2] one thus observable and measurable by a large number of people, including professional scientists;
[3] one which has no explanation in terms of testable natural processes,
[4] which is vastly different in nature from all previous observed and measured phenomena, and
[5] which is impossible for us to fake using technology.
That’s going to be a pretty tall order, fulfilling all of those criteria. Perhaps that’s why mythology fanboys prefer to try and conjure their cartoon magic man into existence with apologetic spells.
We leave those to you. Such as your fake accusation of “appeal to authority” when I posted pages from a book containing known and readily demonstrable factual content. Here’s a clue for you: I wasn’t relying upon any “credentials” the author might have had, but upon his presentation of factual reportage, covering a phenonemon that has been reliably and repeatedly observed by millions of tropical fishkeepers over the past century.
Oh, by the way, “fallacy” is a noun with an irregular plural, and English nouns with regular plurals never use apostrophes.
By the way, what is it with mythology fanboys and superfluous capitalisation?
