Two made up lies in one sentence, and you’re sounding more and more like a theists with every new bs claim.
False dichotomy fallacy. Now while I imagine reliable is another word you’d mangle here to dishonestly pretend your BS has some credence, it is axiomatic that many theists have successfully formed, and been involved in “reliable” governments.
Another lie, and it is you who has from the very first made relentless grandiloquent and self aggrandizing assertions, and all anyone need do is read your posts to see this is the case.
You have failed to defend your asinine ideas when they’re challenged, in every single instance.
Another hilarious and arrogant assumption, that contains neither evidence nor explanation. You’re consistent, I’ll give you that much. The vapidity of your BS is unrelenting. Here’s a heads up for you champ, theists can and have formed secular governments. Indeed the smart theists would recognise the value of separating religion entirely from the state.
Show any of us where we have claimed to be superior. It’s gaslighting bullshit. He willfully misinterprets disagreement as hostility. Anyone disagreeing with him is “suppressing” him. Whole thing smells like theist troll.
That’s because he is a Theist. He’s demonstrated that wonderfully with his arguments. Nothing he says will ever convince me that he was ever an Atheist.
But no one here believes you. If you’ve ever been to court before, you can’t sit there and continue with a bullshit defense towards the jury once the verdict has been passed. And seeing as you feel “attacked” and need to “defend” yourself, a defense only matters when everyone buys your defense and no one here is doing that either.
Nonsense, you made up a lie, and are now making up bs to pretend it was not a lie, but it clearly was. Sweeping hyperbole is always going to get called on here. Now though I have seen some atheists drift through here, and some claiming to be atheists, who make arrogant and sweeping claims, this doesn’t support your original assertions about “atheists”, and certainly not about Cyber, who never remotely made claimed to be superior, what you have quoted simply doesn’t support your assertion at all, it’s disingenuous word salad.
I don’t think you now what all means, and this is at the root of your error here. So FYI if every atheist here disbelieved your dubious assertion to be an atheist, that would not mean all atheists disbelieved you. Also when it was asserted that all atheists have only one thing in common, clearly they meant we can only know they have one thing in common based on the fact they are atheists. It is axiomatic we cannot know what all atheists think beyond that, to make such sweeping claims is ludicrous hyperbole.
Nope, I pointed out that a particular post used word salad. No offence, but is English your first language? Assuming this was directed at me of course, since you neither quoted nor replied directly to my post?
I haven’t spoken for all Atheists. If anything I was referring to my fellow atheists here. Our most active members here have already posted and told you how full of shit you are and will continue to do so. So to answer truthfully, they’ve already spoken for themselves.
Some of those answers were to point out they were poorly constructed, and misrepresented what they were responding to, hence the question as to whether English is your first language.
Why would they need a doctrine? Do you know what doctrine means? They can just weigh your other claims and posts against that one claim, and make an inference as to the likelihood you are as you claim to be. I don’t know if you are or not, but some of your other claims do seem to be at odds with that one.
There isnt. A great example is that most Christians believe everyone they meet are Christians until that person like myself tells them they’re an Atheist. Pretty simple really.
