We’re not Muslims. We’re Atheists. We don’t believe their claims anymore than we believe in yours.
Is that why nineteen Muslim terrorists took 4 planes and attacked the US on 9/11?
I don’t think you know what you’re talking about…
The contents of both bible and koran seem demonstrably manmade to me, the fact they both contain errant nonsense, and have the hallmarks of human fallibility. You are presenting a false dichotomy fallacy as well, as one can disbelieve in both religions.
Neither was your mythology.
If your mythology was written by a fantastically gifted magic entity, why does it contain ridiculous nonsense, such as that cretinous bilge about genetics being controlled by coloured sticks?
How about you engage some brain cells for a moment, and ponder the following?
Your favourite choice of pre-scientific mythology asserts that your cartoon magic man (if it exists of courses, this itself being merely one of many unsupported blind assertions presented in said mythology) purportedly possesses “perfect foreknowledge” of the future.
As a corollary, if this assertion is correct, your cartoon magic man must have known in advance, that the cretinous assertion about genetics being controlled by coloured sticks, would be utterly destroyed in the 19th century by a monk conducting thousands of intricate experiments with peaflowers.
In the light of this, why did your cartoon magic man allow itself to be associated with that assertion within your mythology, if it knew in advance that said assertion would be falsified by rigorous scientific experiments? To those of us not wearing your particularly asinine brand of ideological blinkers, this is a hilarious absurdity, and if you don’t understand why, then that tells us how intellectually palsying your brand of ideological blinkers are.
The obvious conclusion is that your cartoon magic man was invented by Bronze Age nomads who knew nothing about basic biology, and who never thought that their mythology would be examined for such nonsense by people possessing genuine substantive knowledge of the universe and its contents.
Indeed, the authors of your mythology were incapable of even fantasising about vast classes of entities and interactions, that scientists have alighted upon, and which have been placed by said scientists into usefully predictive quantitative frameworks of knowledge, of a sort that the authors of your sad little Bronze Age mythology would have regarded as magic.
Indeed, modern scientific discoveries have rendered vast swathes of your mythology null and void. The whole Genesis 1 creation myth is known to be a farcical fabrication by anyone who paid attention in basic science classes. The “global flood” is likewise known to be a diseased fairy tale by anyone familiar with geology or biology.
For that matter, one of the reasons that I KNOW, that the “global flood” myth is a deranged farce, is because I kept and bred successfully numerous species of tropical fish over a 35 year period. Those fish possess stringent water chemistry requirements, and will die in short order if those stringent water chemistry requirements are not met.
In order to be successful, fishkeepers such as myself have to constrain the water chemistry of an aquarium to remain within well-defined ranges of pH, dissolved mineral content and dissolved organic content. The fish in said aquarium die if we don’t. Millions of fishkeepers around the planet are therefore ideally placed to understand that the “global flood” is hooey.
This is because if the fantasy “global flood” had ever happened, aquatic organisms would have been exterminated wholesale by osmoregulatory shock and rampant habitat destruction. This one elementary fact on its own destroys the “global flood” fairy tale, even before we factor in to the equation the many other reasons why people with functioning neurons can toss the “global flood” garbage into the bin.
All you have to offer in the face of hard facts destroying your mythology’s numerous ridiculous assertions, is infantile clinging to said mythology and uncritical acceptance of its multifarious nonsense. You have zero substance to offer here.
I expect you won’t even display the basic discoursive honesty of acknowledging the existence of this post, let alone addressing the issues raised therein, because you’ve already established a track record here of having NO interest in genuine debate, but instead regard this forum as yet another pulpit from which to disseminate mindless and at times obnoxiously sanctimonious proselytising.
That you don’t even have enough faith in your religion to address salient issues presented to you, speaks volumes about the intellectual indolence said religion fosters.
Like you, they assert much and establish nothing of substance. I treat their offerings in the same manner as I treat yours, and those of others of your ilk. If you ever exert some diligence here, you’ll find I have the track record to back that statement.
This mythology “authenticates” nothing, and is as vacuous as yours in this regard. Indeed, I suspect you’ve never read it, unlike myself.
Complete and utter poppycock. Now I know you haven’t read it.
Oh wait, for example, we have Sura 2:136:
Then we have Sura 61:6, viz:
Here’s a clue for you: don’t try and pass off as fact, whatever fabrications you pulled out of your rectal passage here, because we live now in an age where fact checking can be performed in seconds. You make shit up, you’ll be found out.
And like them all you have at bottom is “my mythology says so”.
2 Likes