Yes you wanted answer in Mass,length and time and ignoring that there can be unknown energy in universe that can’t be described by just MLT.
Is it because you don’t want to accept the possibility or simplify down/dumb down ,every unknown energy in terms of MLT.
Really?
Your profile says you are atheist, however, you think a god has properties?
There CAN be….hmmm….your previous posts sure sounded like you were asserting that there IS unknown/undetected energy.
I was differeniating God and unknown energy and what you said instead.
Yes that is what it says.
I said that God is more likely complex to exist than unknown energy that take form of ghosts/aliens etc.
Do you miss my point.
I just answered your question!
I said one more point because you said.
Energy has the dimension I listed. If you are describing something with a different dimension, it isn’t energy, it is something else. Referring to something that has different dimensions as energy is dishonest as fuck.
1 Like
Then describe dark energy with MLT, assuming it is the energy holding universe intact.
mass times length times length divided by time, divided by time is the dimension needed to cause acceleration. Dark energy has the same dimensions as the energy in a 9 volt battery (as do all other energies, by definition).
1 Like
Or Dark energy can balance gravitational potetial energy holding universe together.
So it’s dim are same as potential energy.
Yeah a 9v Battery has that too.
So that answers my question,thanks.
But is that what dark matter really is.
I think we missed a part here,it is undetectable in lab.
Now my hypothetical energy is also undetectable in lab.
Means you can’t disprove my hypothetical undetectable energy.
Science has never proved or disproved anything. You seem to be suffering from a fundamental misunderstanding. You don’t seem interested in learning, good luck.
1 Like
As you are the one asserting there is undetectable energy, the burden of proof lies squarely on your shoulders. No one is obligated to disprove your hypothesis.
You really think I am not interested in learning.
I am sure arguing more with others here and they teaches me a lot, they never says that I suffer from misunderstanding.
They says there part,I say my part.
I think nobody takes things seriously.
This is who I am ,accept my way if thinking.
And don’t think that I don’t like you.
[Edited]
I am saying that we can’t prove/disprove unknown energy.
Just assume it is a pseudo science for now.
But there is a possibility it may exist.
There is the possibility that there’s a teacup behind the moon. It seems you’ve pulled a possibility out for display simply to argue something.
But what if there is unknown ‘energy?’ “I’m adding that one to my own theistic rants.”
2 Likes
You cannot just claim there is a possibility without any evidence of it being possible. Possibilities are accepted when evidence indicates acceptance is warranted. Do you think it possible that I could fart hard enough to lift myself off of the ground?
.
.
Edit (Laser Beans)
The ironic part is, I’m sure there is all kinds of unknown forms of energy. But I can be confident: these as of yet undiscovered forms of energy will be constructed out of mass * length * length/(time*time). Just like in the future, previously unknown mammals will be discovered. The one thing we can be sure of about these new mammals is that they will be mammals! Just as any unknown form of energy, will be energy! Typically this goes without saying, but today it seems necessary.
2 Likes
Is that relevant? The fact is that we now hallucinations are possible, but we do not even know what a ghost is, let alone if it possible.
Well off you go, you have the entire internet at your disposal.
is it? I think you would need to properly evidence that claim, even so you’re left with a why again, we can draw no rational conclusions based on not knowing something.
This sounds like a guess to me, based on a bare claim.
Another bare claim / guess.
Anecdotal unevidenced claim, dear oh dear…
I don’t believe you, since I don’t base belief on bare claims and guesses.
Well this doesn’t answer my question at all, why would we believe claims that we don’t have any objective evidence are possible? Vague unevidenced feelings isn’t a reason obviously, one could believe literally anything that way.
Well that’s not actually what you said, you implied I should lend more credence to your claim because you are an atheist, at least that was how I read it. I fail to see what atheism has to do with this unevidenced claim?
Except I see no evidence at all for anything paranormal, again i see no objective evidence such a thing is possible. Also your claim is no different than claims that typically assert a deity exists, you are using the same vague appeals to mystery, and the same assumptions I have seen religious apologists use over and over again.
For what, in order to not leap to unevidenced assumptions? This is sounding more and more like an argumentum ad ignorantiam fallacy.
Excellent, and you can demonstrate some objective evidence to support this assertion right? Only I haven’t seen you demonstrate any objective evidence anything is real yet. You don’t simply get to assert this, and claim that this makes it different. You seem more and more eager to bend the facts to your belief, than the other way around, it’s a very flawed way to reason if you care that what you believe is true or accurate.
Did you say, “clams and glasses”? Oh wait. It looks like i’m the one who needs glasses!
1 Like
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha … Do you have anything at all supporting Buddhist beliefs outside bare claims and guesses? Any claim at all you can support with facts and evidence to be true? (Damn I sound more like Sheldon every day.)
1 Like
Sure. How about the ability to relax the body and mind through attention to the breath?
Called “mindfulness of breathing” (anapanasati).
Not the first time in history that breath has been linked to relaxation, but, regardless - a “Buddhist belief” backed by modern research (ie. confirmed over and over again by people of all walks of life).
How’s that for you, you filthy sapiens?
Anyone can relax. It does not take Buddhism to do so.
Anyone can learn to breath and to be mindful. Do you imagine Buddhism to be something special? Like all religions, it usurped that which is completely human and tried to mystify it.
Buddhist belief has not been backed by modern research. Show me reputable research for the existence of Nirvana? Give me a break. You already admitted that Relaxation is not a Buddhist thing. Give me one esoteric Buddhist belief backed by empirical scientific study and independent validation.