No I meant when I click reply on a post, it doesn’t show me that I’ve replied to that particular person unless I click “edit”.
Report it but someone might have noticed by now.
Mine does not say I replied directly to you last time.
I Actually have to type @aketo then it goes more directly to you.
Is that what you mean?
Edit; Too stoned to figure anything out. And that was on resent scraped from my bowl.
Yes that’s it. I still got the notification last time, so it probably doesn’t matter what it shows.
Lmao you seem to be doing good with the thinking then 
1 Like
Right now fiction is my game, and since it is sexual in nature I am not allowed to share it here.
I got paid 10 for it so I need to finish it.
But still, thanks and LOL.
Edit; Watching MTVClassic.
1 Like
Wait what do you do? Got paid for fiction? You don’t have to answer, I’m just curious what you meant.
1 Like
Post removed by Admin. Content inappropriate and not relevant to this forum.
1 Like
TMI Fievel, Sorry dude but that is not something that should go public and certainly not something you should be proud of.
3 Likes
I’ve noticed some odd behavior like that, but haven’t managed to pin it down. As suggested earlier by @anon14261619 , if in doubt, just start your message with @username, which also supports autocomplete, at least on my browser.
1 Like
Yes thanks a lot. 
Eww…….yuck! There is no way, in holy hell, I am EVER going over there and reading that. I would rather read “A Brief History of Time” by Stephen Hawkins, so I’m out.
1 Like
No problem I have enough there who like what I do.
And there’s actually better than 50% of all material which is General.
I’m sure we could possibly learn more about the material universe if we could do that, perhaps have a better grasp of physics, laws of nature etc…
But I would imagine that at the deepest depths of its mysteries, we as a species lack the understand to fathom everything within the universe.
That’s actually illegal in Australia. IE an indictable offence which means a person can go to prison. As a point of interest, Australia has no statute of limitations for sexual crimes.
Apart from that, I think it’s creepy and rather disgusting.
You’ve come awfully close to identifying as an active paedophile.
1 Like
Here in America it fits into freedom of expression as long as no real child is being harmed in any way.
No statute of limitations for sexual crimes?
I don’t agree with that really as there should be. Here in America I believe it was 15 years. But they should be able to get you for such things all the time.
At least it is fiction and often it isn’t even human characters I am writing about. In any case it is fiction and not real.
I do not abuse children as I have morals and that sort of stuff scars a child for life. Regardless what the law is I do not abuse for those reasons I just mentioned.
That is not the meaning of the word. Literally, a paedophile is simply a person who loves children. Although sexual activity is not implied, here it tends to be interpreted that way by Joe Public.
On reflection I might be mistaken. You actually sound more like a hebrophile. IE a person attracted to adolescent children. However, that’s a distinction without a difference under our laws. Creation or possession of even nude images of such children is also illegal here. As is written pornography.
You’re lucky you live in the US. If you lived here I’d report you in a heartbeat.
I can understand how that might suit you. However, simply claiming ‘there should be’ is not a cogent argument, or in fact an argument at all.
I retain my opinion of your attitude and of your sordid behaviour. I have nothing further to say to you on this topic
2 Likes
There are are laws here in the USA against human sexual art of underage characters, but the problem is they are having problems actually enforcing these laws as it falls into a section of the US Constitution on freedom of expression.
When no minors are involved in such art it is difficult to enforce this as well. What they will do is charge you for it if you are found with real photos of underage children in sexual situations.
Drawings of fictional boys in sexual situations have no real victims, so when it goes to court there’s no children to testify against such collections of art.
They are having problems just enforcing the real thing, and some pedophiles are on the streets as they could not bring charges against them for technicalities.
There’s a large flow of illegal images floating about the Dark Web, they catch one here and there, but they really have no control on this as it is so out of control. I don’t go on the Dark Web, it requires three steps and a VPN to hide yourself.
Just recently they arrested a man who had 8,000 images on his computer of minors engaged in sexual activity. That is just one, the amount of illegal images out there is ridiculous. Digital technology doesn’t help as it is easier to take these photos and place them on the dark web. If one person is caught with 8,000 images, imagine how many there are out there.
I am doing my part by not getting involved in any of this activity, and sticking with fiction.
What do you do with your fiction? Do you share it?
1 Like
Yes in only a few places and when it contains human characters it does not go up on the website mentioned. The website mentioned allows only animal art and all human stuff is banned. Of course unless it is rated (General)
Whereas the Japanese have dozens of different sets of numbers, depending on whether the objects being counted are flat, cylindrical, animal, people, insects, birds, shoes… And for added fun, their language doesn’t distinguish between singular or plural.
1 Like