Buddhism - a religion for atheists

This is a baby :baby:t3: brain :brain:

1 Like

Hahahahaha AND like this thread, I’ll ignore your “temptations” and see through it for the bullshit it really is…

1 Like

Well no actually, since all the claims I made about meditation can be supported by objective evidence, like lowering heart rate and blood pressure and aiding relaxation, the claims you’re making still sound like woo woo. I also didn’t tell you that you were “doing it wrong”, which is what you said to me. The only thing I have questioned are the claims you are making that use woo woo terms and make bold claims that you cannot demonstrate any objective evidence for.

How does that address your original fallacy?

Well that’s just subjective hearsay, you can’t imagine anyone here will simply accept a bare claim of this nature, especially when you are suing terms that outside of your religion appear to be meaningless, unevidenced, and which have as far as I can see no objective explanatory powers.

Anyone can put a blood pressure cuff on me before and after meditation and see objective evidence for the claim I can use it to lower my heart rate and blood pressure. What objective evidence can you demonstrate for your claim that are even close to that?

Well again these are subjective terms from your religious beliefs, As I said we have senses, and those senses allow us to detect things, what is sense consciousness and what objective evidence can you demonstrate for it?

Again see above, and explain accurately what this means and show objective evidence for it.

Well again accurately explain what this means, and demonstrate objective evidence to support it. Otherwise the claim is meaningless.

10/10, have a like for that post sir.

It happens with sleep paralysis if you can open your eyes first. You have to teach yourself how to do it. It could be referred to as a minimally conscious state. It’s just a brain state. You can probably experience it if you practice lucid dreaming or what is called astral projection. It’s just one of the brain states attributed to woo woo but with completely natural causes.

2 Likes

I’d call it a philosophy before I called it a religion.

For real?

You don’t believe we have sense faculties? You don’t believe we have eyes; ears; nose; tongue; a body?

Really? That’s as far as the claim goes, Sheldon. I’m not arguing that Jesus rose from the dead :tongue:

And sense objects? You don’t believe that there are forms external to the body? You don’t believe that forms give off an image; give off sounds; give off scents; tastes; tactile feelings when touched?

Again. Seriously? Do you NOT see how this bears no relation to religion? We’re talking common sense.

Sense consciousness? This merely implies (as any MRI can show) that there is activity in the brain when an eye meets a sight. Ie. the “seeing” occurs in the brain - not in the eye. The eye is necessary (just as the sight is) but without that sense consciousness in the brain, there is no “seeing” (no “perception”).

How is this religious? How is not self evident?

Hmm :thinking: I pissed some one off along the way. You’ve always been so cordial. Where did I go wrong?

Go into one of your trance/meditation thingies and ask your overlord.

3 Likes

OK, my anger has passed and I will explain.

I have tried to treat everyone with respect, by being polite, sincere, and honest. Have you reciprocated in like with me?

Of at times punked and trolled me?

Of course you are super respectful with everyone. At one point you respectfully refused to speak with me on account that you thought it may exasperate my known mental condition.

So, do I respect you? Absolutely.

You asked if I was pranking you with my grim perceptions of society. I replied that I wasn’t.

The conversation turned to faith as a form of motivation and I suppose the discussion was going fine until I dropped that comment about “the law of attraction”.

That wasn’t meant to anger you - but a joke IS only funny when everyone laughs - so my sincere regrets.

And then the fire comments. I admit … I don’t know man’s history or evolutionary relationship with fire. I shouldn’t comment on things I have absolutely no knowledge of. My apologies again.

RATTY - Nooooooooooooo! Does that mean you are going to be leaving us? Your inane bullshit is habit forming.

Perhaps you could just look out your window and comment on the weather. Surely you are alert enough to know if the sun is shining or if it is raining.

Well. Quite honestly, if you’ve been reading, David has recommended I be banned, so you may just have to live without my inane bullshit.

David is cool. Get a little tougher skin. Your response was fine. He just want’s to be taken seriously and for you to cut the crap with him. He does not know that you don’t know how to cut the crap…so he thinks you are fucking with him… Cutting the crap is one of those things that people do that you just can’t figure out how and when they know how to do it. When you are with people, you get a read on them but when you are writing… well face it… 95% of all the clues are gone. So, it makes perfect sense that you would miss it.

1 Like

So you are returning to the usual facile duplicitous misrepresentations of my posts, that’s pretty sad.

What a ridiculous lie,this is where I would normally waste my time quoting the woo woo claims you have added to basic facts, but seriously, why bother when you’re being so dishonest, and will simply ignore them or attack me again?

Sigh, :roll_eyes: please quote a single post of mine anywhere remotely claiming this.

If by this you mean these few watered down claims you are now dishonestly pretending is all you have claimed then yes I see that you have spectacularly and dishonestly moved the goal posts yet again. What’s not clear is why you think this will go unnoticed or unchallenged. I shan’t waste my time quoting the other woo woo religious claims you have made, as others have seen them, and you will simply not address your claims honestly, or admit they are subjective faith based claims the same as all religions make.

Sense consciousness, means sensory awareness; consciousness through the senses. And again it is the woo woo claims you have previously attached to objective facts, that I and others have objected to, as you must know.

I choose the walk the path of calm and peace, not agitated anger. It is my preference to put it behind me.

Life is too short to be angry and living in strife.

1 Like

How is this not trolling?

1 Like

That wasn’t a rhetorical question, Shelly. Would it kill you to give a straight “yes” or “no”? Are you in fear of defeat? After all. The premises are so ridiculously basic, it doesn’t surprise me that you continue to give this probably exhausting Song and dance.

FFS, Sheldon. I don’t need you to say it. You’ve perpetually asked for objective evidence of these things! I don’t need any such thing. They’re self evident. Just honestly answer if you think such things exist. Let’s forget the past. What is your current opinion? How hard is it for you to lose this game, Shelly?

No. Quite clearly, in my previous post I explained that any MRI will detect activity of any case where, for example, the ear hears a sound. The sound does not occur in the sound itself. The sound does not occur in the ear itself. The sound occurs in the mind and can be demonstrated by machines like Magnetic Resonance Imaging - ie. sense awareness is something that happens in the brain. Ie. sense consciousness is something that happens in the brain.

These are my premises - simple premises which any fool could answer. And yet Sheldon continues to demand “objective evidence” for them.

I’m not trying to make anyone look stupid. I am extremely frustrated that I have a point to make which includes some very basic premises and despite how obvious they are - I can not get a straight answer from the person I am talking to.

How is his behaviour not “trolling”; “not frustrating”; not “deliberately evasive and dishonest”.

I’m telling you, Nyar - if the nut bar would just admit to the existence of the sense faculties and the sense objects and sense consciousness, this 300 + Post thread could come to a very succinct end.

I am NOT trying to make anyone look like a fool.

I’m pretty sure that is a lie. Not 100% though as your communication skills are pretty bad. It might be possible you are just really dumb.

1 Like