As if my claim needed any more proof, this dude makes it clear he knows neither what an ad hominem nor a red herring are.
Can you demonstrate that God said such a thing?
To whom are you asking me to demonstrate this?
Can you demonstrate that God said such a thing?
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ⌠Witness the DunningâKruger effect in action. Not only does the OP imagine himself to be witty, intelligent, and in possession of secret knowledge, but he actively seeks out those he imagines to be beneath him, (Anyone disagreeing with his nonsense.) by visiting atheist chat sites, and anonymously spouting his bullshit in broken record fashion while pretending he is having a conversation.
I give the guy about 2 more posts before one of the mods wakes up and bans his ass. Thereby proving to himself that he is persecuted by the non-believers who do not want to hear his message of truth.
This is just the state of mind one falls into once they accept the idea that they were created as bad little magical mud zombies who are incapable of following rules without fucking up.
What sort of breakfast cereal has the above printed on the carton? One of those dry super all-bran with extra roughage, dates, added laxatives and zero-sugar brands?
Iâll stick to toast.
Atheists love to tell me what they âknowâ, but they have no ability to tell me how they know. In other words, they are ignorant, immature children.
Nah, each village needs their own idiot.
But I will act on complaints. Right now I perceive more insults than abuse, and a fool who is under the misunderstanding that demolishing atheism somehow proves a god.
No one has asserted that they know anything. What the fuck drug are you on? Dunning Kruger in full force once again. Your ad-homonym bullshit only serves to make you look ignorant. If you have an argument for the existence of your God. Present it. If not⌠Fuck Off.
Oh yea, like you can demolish ânon-belief.â
You want me to tell you why I think your god is fiction, but you donât want to say why you think all other gods are? Too close to home? Would those reasons too easily apply to your own god?
Why do you think calling people unreasoning animals, deluded narcissist, immature children, and a mindless automaton (my personal favorite since it was applied directly to me), doesnât qualify as ad hominem?
Viceregent has been given a short time-out
@Cognostic He will cite the Bible, and all that, but that is not enough to convince you or us. Trying to reason with him, is like trying to reason with an angry toddlerâŚit is of no use.
I know how to argue with an angry toddler⌠"Sweeeeeettttyyyyy! Can I borrow your rolling pin? "
@Cognostic HAHAHAHA!!! You just made me blow milk out of my nose!
I hope itâs a marble rolling pin. Those are the best .
Well, leaving aside the fact youâve been trolling in multiple threads, Iâll humour your latest attempt.
My criteria for belief is that sufficient objective evidence is demonstrated to support any claim.
SoâŚwhat objective evidence can you demonstrate for any deity?
Be a dear and link a worthy scientific source for your latest asinine bs.
Please demonstrate some objective evidence for your claim that reason is non-material?
The material exists as an objective fact, as does reason, if you want to add your superstitious woo woo deity, then you will need something more than an argumentum ad ignorantiam fallacy.
You either donât know what rational means, or youâre trolling. Or both of course.
How do you?
You donât understand circular reasoning fallacies, or science.
If I was to guess Iâd say youâre in your teensâŚ
I hope so anyway, otherwise this display is embarrassing.
Hilariously you seem to have cornered the entire worldâs supply of irony, and in a single sentence.
The grammar is also impressive, but for all the wrong reasons.
Do you know what a comma is for?
Irony overloadâŚ
My large, heavy duty, stainless steel bodied irony meter just exploded.
So, having had your your overly verbose OP exposed for the fatuous nonsense it is, you resort to insult?
And now you are suspended from the forums? Well, who would think itâŚMust be hard being so super intelligent and having to seek out moronic atheists to demonstrate your all round superiority.
OhâŚhereâs a thought, you cannot âlogicâ, âreasonâ or argue your god of choice into existence.
Your Op is just one more fallacious load of trollop in a long line of âclevererâ theists with verbal diarrhea and nothing else.
This chew toy has lost its squeaker.