Would you be interested....?

I addressed what you said: Yes, the Bible is offered as the perfect words of God—although what MY ( it appears that capitals are important) opinion is that it is one of man’s many approaches towards the concept of God.
Hopefully, that is more clear.

I agreed that the Bible is offered as the perfect words of God and that my opinion is that it is one of man’s many approaches towards the concept of God. I do not feel that it is the ONLY book that can be used for that purpose, but the doctrine of Jesus DOES set it apart. All ideologies contain some aspect of the Golden Rule, but only Jesus presents it as the most important code of conduct and only Jesus presents the rule as how humanity shows love for God. If I am a heretic for thinking this way, so be it. I’ve said several times that my opinion is not an apparently popular one.

As I also believe that I have stated: I have tried telling that to “hardcore” ( what does that even mean?) Christians. You are right. The reception has mostly been unfavorable, but not universally so.

There are a group who take into account the verse:

But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. (2 Peter 3:8)

These people believe that this indicates a literal thousand year period, but with scriptural references that the Greek word “hos” means “like”, a similitude, some can understand how I can believe that the meaning is: that God is outside of earth time. That does not mean, however that they agree with me. This was and apparently still is a nearly impossible concept for people to entertain and would have been nearly impossible in antiquity to conceive.

I can tell my children the EXACT same thing and they can have different renderings of it, especially if it is in regards to things like time. For instance, I can say: Go get your dishes from upstairs. One daughter may perceive that I mean right away, and another may feel that time is indefinite and she can finish a personal project. The more complex the message, the more this becomes true.

I think that I did address this also. But I will attempt to explain my thoughts further. I feel that the Bible is one of man’s many approaches towards the concept of God. I don’t think that God wrote it. I know that men did. I do however feel that an intense desire to love God and know Him led these people towards greater understanding. I do not feel the Bible is the ONLY book that has achieved and can achieve this, but I do feel that Jesus achieved something outstanding, as he clarified a nearly universal code of conduct as being the way that humanity shows love for God.

Perhaps they have, but the answer wasn’t what you wanted. Perhaps not. I haven’t met many people who agree with me.

[quote=“Tin-Man, post:115, topic:2910”]
Oh, and you still haven’t explained why you believe in and praise such a god.
/quote]

I realized that after I’d answered your questions, but then it was time to make dinner for my family. You are right about that. My apologies.

@Calilasseia

Who said hate? I’ve missed something.

Oh! I posted that picture because cog mentioned Mao Zedong. I wasn’t calling him names. It was a spray paint picture I happened by yesterday, and it made me think of what he said in response to something I had written about Stalin.

For what it is worth, I don’t think y’all are evil.

@David_Killens Thanks, David. I do appreciate that. Y’all don’t have to like me, but perhaps we can learn from each other. We don’t have to agree to learn something. I have already learned a lot, and hope to continue to. In theist circles, I spend quite a bit of time explaining why I believe in scientific things and that is a stumbling block in broadening mutual scientific or historical horizons.

You are welcome Tia. Although I am not innocent, I attempt to attack the argument, and not the person.

1 Like

Sorry, that is on you. You issued a fuzzy instruction that is open to interpretation. All that is required is inserting a few words.

“Go get ALL your dishes from upstairs NOW.”

I am a mechanic by training and inclination. And I have worked in aerospace. In that environment we live and die by tech manuals. And they are precise. A person with the appropriate training will read a tech manual, and regardless of the experience and age of the technician and whether it was performed 50 years ago or now, the work would be performed identical.

Instruction books can be written so that there is zero ambiguity and not open to any interpretation. The bible is the opposite, it is the great book of multiple choices and interpretations.

5 Likes

It’s probably a good strategy. I just attack, monkey fur and pooo flying everywhere, feet, toes, and fingers in mouths and up noses. It tends to be one big fray of assholes and rolling pins, and that’s just practice before logging into the site.

It is the ‘WRITER’S RESPONSIBILITY’ to write clearly and not the ‘READERS RESPONSIBILITY’ to interpret the writer correctly. If there is room for interpretation, you have not been clear.

Reminds me of the great poem, Walrus and the Carpenter. Lewis Carrol swore there was no religious intent in the poem. HE LIED or he is a SHIT WRITER. lol

We both know we operate under different strategies.

If you are full-frontal assault, I am the pastor who shakes your hand but steals your watch.

1 Like

@David_Killens I wish we could all talk, rather than type at times. I am this moment walking with my children and pups. What I thinking, although abstractly does involve my children coming to know me and what I want. Perhaps I should adjust my example. I will finish walking and determine on the way.

@Tin-Man @skriten

Okay! I’m back. Firstly, I will address why I believe what I believe.

Please know that I am aware how extremely personal this is and that my experience may mean absolutely nothing to you.

I’m not trying to convince you of anything. I’m just answering your question to the best of my ability.

My approach towards God was not instantaneous. It was and is progressive.
As I have mentioned previously, I did not believe in an interactive God for most of my life. I don’t know how something instantaneous would have even affected me.

At that time, I didn’t even think about God enough to join a group like this. Y’all encounter the concept of God far more than I ever did.
Then I died.
My heart stopped.
I “awoke” to the wires from a heart shunt sort of dangling out of my chest and the expectant expressions of concerned family members, but that was it.
I learned that my heart had stopped while I was unconscious. But I remembered nothing.
Not a thing.

Now, everyone I had ever heard of dying had experienced something. I had never thought about it before but, perhaps I had expected to experience something too despite my lack of faith.

I didn’t start believing then, but the significance of life, had become noticably more profound to me and far less intentionally expendable.

Months passed without much of a change. That was until that situation with a crazy ex and a friend who read to me the passage concerning love in 1 Corinthians 13.

Until that moment, I was completely resistant to reading or even hearing about the Bible. But afterwards, because of the timing or content, or recitation…I no longer felt disdain towards the Bible. I just did not care about it. It was a book, with some potentially pleasant parts.

When a friend’s mother passed and I decided to read the Bible she’d left him to understand her notations in the margins-- for his sake, I read it in a completely different way than it had ever been explained to me.

As I read, over a course of time, I had various realizations that caused me to consider things in a way I once again never had before.

I started testing myself against those considerations such as my refined definition of love. As I did this, my life began to change for the better. I reacted differently to my external environment, thus my external environment adjusted accordingly.

I decided that I wanted to be a better person than I had been, but I didn’t know how to do that. My group was a mostly cynical and self-serving lot, and I found that I didn’t want to be that way anymore. So, I became a loner.

I eventually came across scriptures such as Galatians 5:22-23

The fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control. Against such things there is no law.

and 2 Peter 1:5-7:
For this very reason, make every effort to add to your faith goodness; and to goodness, knowledge; and to knowledge, self-control; and to self-control, perseverance; and to perseverance, godliness; and to godliness, mutual affection; and to mutual affection, love.

As I learned more, I discovered what I wanted to be through recognizing those qualities I agreed with in the scriptures, on top of what I already recognized and agreed with elsewhere. I realized somewhere along the way, that my reactions were not the only thing that had become different…I had.

I started to recognize some influence interacting in my life and in me as it had with those very mortal writers of the Bible.

I recognized myself in many the scriptures: I recognized humanity’s often stumbling approach to the concept of knowing God.

We are doing right now, by the way: dissecting and considering, refining what we believe and disbelieve. When we do this, we are doing what those councils of old did in compiling the Bible in the first place.

What is meaningful? What is too superstitious? I’m sure a great deal of you have read what was disallowed in the final Canon for seemingly superstitious or potentially fallacious reasons.

I’ve found that I think of religious or “spiritual” experience like consciousness, and the rest of the living and material world: an evolution. Some things will die out as existence progresses. Some things will change or mutate by small, seemingly incremental stages, some things will transform suddenly, and become entirely a new creature.

Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new. (2 Corinthians 5:17)

I learned that the violence in the Bible was actually committed by men and was qualified by those same men and others like them as sanctified by God, even though the commandments say: DO NOT KILL.

And in just the same way people wage holy wars today in Jesus’ name even when Jesus himself said to love God is to love each other–even the least of us. Whoever does not know love, does not know God. (1 John 4:8)

I eventually came across scriptures such as Jeremiah 24:7 And I will give them an heart to know me, that I am the LORD: and they shall be my people, and I will be their God: for they shall return unto me with their whole heart.

By this time, I understood that knowing God and experiencing God was not meeting some bearded, magic man who sits down at a table across from me.

I realized that to entertain that expectation was to entertain a notion carried over from a perspective of belief (or tongue in cheek disbelief) that I do not, nor have ever agreed with.

@David_Killens Perhaps, I mentioned my children earlier because I experience a similitude of what I know of God through loving them. The only difference is that know that I have made and will make mistakes. I fully realize that I am NOT perfect.

Even so, I still want my children to listen to what advice I do know is good for them.

Simultaneously, I want them to be their own people. I want them to learn from me, not to wear me or my ideals like some heavy coat that I throw over their head to make them obey my directives.

I want them to know that I love and want the best for them so that they WANT to respect and adhere to what I do know.
But, I want to give them room enough to grow and make their own realizations and determinations. I want them to evolve from my love and what I have taught them to become something all their own.

I have to get to work and this is more hurried than I would like. I will probably edit it. Just FYI.

Thanks, y’all. I hope y’all have a good day.

1 Like

Go back, Read all the same scriptures you found so endearing, and ask yourself this. HAS YOUR LOVING GOD LIVED UP TO EVEN ONE OF THEM?

The god of the bible is the god of “Do as I say, not as I do.” The god of the bible is a fucking asshole. The fact that he can think of no better way to save humanity than through a blood sacrafice of his own son is certainly evidence of that. The god of the bible is BULLSHIT.

There was no sacrafice and god knew there would be no sacrafice before he did the fucking sacrafice. It’s all fucking stupid.

@Cognostic would you like my thoughts on Jesus’ death as it relates to the scriptures? I’m also not entirely sure if it is a popular notion. But I will give it to you.

Thank you, @Tia_Thompson, for your further illustration; I think it boiled down to the fact that your believing in a god and the contents of the Christian bible is more a result of personal experience than anything else. Fair enough, if I’m interpreting things correctly.

At the very least I’m glad to hear you, according to the account, found a technique to start onto the path of being a better person.

Hopefully its understood, though, that in a forum of this nature, there will always be folks who take issue with continuing to adhere to that technique. :wink:

3 Likes

@Bluedoc I fully expect you to give me your opinions. If they are constructive to any degree, they will make me a better person with a more refined understanding of what I believe.

How about demonstrating Jesus existed. Then demonstrate that he had magical powers. Then let’s talk about which version of his death. The one where he was nailed to a tree? The one where he was nailed to a pole? Or the Christian fairytale where he was pinned up on a cross?

Abstract. On three occasions, Acts refers to Jesus’ crucifixion as ‘hanging on a tree’ (5.30; 10.39; 13.29), a phrase alluding to the proscriptions for displaying an Israelite convicted of a capital crime (Deut. 21.22-23).

“The crucifix, a cross upon which an image of Christ is present, is not known to have been used until the 6th century AD.” Christian cross - Wikipedia.

IT"S ALL MADE UP!

Thank you for responding. I am fully aware of how difficult it can be to attempt to explain and/or defend your beliefs. Please try to accept that many here have gone through an evolution of their own thinking to arrive at the place they now reside intellectually.
You must try to understand that what you think makes sense to you, has no bearing on whether or not the things you think actually are true when considered outside of your own consciousness, unless and until they are verified by external observations. Otherwise, how can one tell between an astute or sagacious understanding, and the self-deluded and self-serving fanciful thinking of an untutored mind?
Therefore, you will probably not find much support here for ideas such as “Then I died”, or “Now, everyone I had ever heard of dying had experienced something”. When you casually embrace such notions as these, or indeed the undefined notion of the “spiritual” it is a clear indication of a lack of critical thinking.
It is apparent, at least to me, that you have wanted all along to find credibility in the bible and with the notion of a god. You are not unique in that regard, as others here have expressed this as a barrier to freeing themselves of the indoctrination or programming that they experienced. In your case it may be far less obvious, but rest assured that most people have been relentlessly bombarded with the Christian narratives, whether they are aware of it or not.
If you are content to believe in something for “personal experience” reasons which cannot in any way be shown to comport with reality, then so be it and I honestly wish you “good luck” with that.
The motivation to

is certainly admirable and hopefully something most of us aspire for.
Thanks again for responding to multiple posters and “y’all” have a good day.

4 Likes

Good morning, Tia. Thank you for sharing that. Just getting my day started, sitting here at my kitchen table with my bottle of water and cup of morning coffee. Got a busy day ahead, so will be having to get dressed and head out shortly. Don’t want to rush my reply on what you said, so it will likely be this evening before I get back to it. Just wanted to let you know I saw your reply and will be tumbling it around in my head while out and about. Meanwhile, I will leave you with this, while it’s fresh on my mind…

Based on your posts and interactions on our humble little site, you seem to be a genuinely good person, and it’s actually nice having you around. And if I seem like a sarcastic smartass at times, it is because… well… I’m a sarcastic smartass. Simply my nature. That being said, please understand I am not criticizing YOU personally in my replies. If believing in your god the way you do helps you cope with life and be a better person, then you have every right to do so. And I fully support that right. However, what I and others here are trying to do is help you see that you can be (you ARE) a good person without relying on a source that has caused FAR MORE pain and misery than it has ever caused peace and comfort. Especially when that source is based on so many inconsistencies and contradictions. Anyway, gotta go for now. Will try to get back when things settle down this evening.

3 Likes

Good day to you, Tin-Man!

It’s nice being around. Y’all seem like genuine people, with genuine albeit occasionally strange answers.

You are alright, Tin-Man. You’ve been a gentleman, even when you have been direct. At any rate, I appreciate directness over duplicity any day.

Take your time and take care. Thanks!

1 Like

@skriten

I do understand and respect that entirely. A person’s disbelief is just as personal and emotionally tied as a person’s belief-- in some cases more so.

I do again understand this. This is why I introduced my views by stating:

And have stated elsewhere:

As stated, I am not trying to convince you or anyone else for that matter. You asked and I am obliging. Nothing more. I’m sharing with you something about me and my experience.

Perhaps not.

Thanks, for your time and consideration anyway. I hope you have a good night.

As I have pointed out several times 2 Peter is a 3rd century invention.

Presupposing that a jesus figure as described in the gospels ever existed. That is debatable and very unsafe supposition to base one’s life upon.

Fraudulent text lifted from (I surmise) some wishfully thinking sermon in the late second century. Unlikely to have anything to do with the jesus figure. It reads (to me) like a very greek insertion and could even be much later than the 3rd century. Examples of this kind of textual insertion are rife in the NT. A very flimsy foundation for a life.

I would very much like to hear and read your take on the manner of your jesus’ fiigure’s death and supposed rebirth. I wonder which of the myriad traditions that existed at the turn of the second century you will espouse?