Only if you’re tossing coins. I think reality is more like a roulette wheel. If one hypothesis turns out to be wrong, there are infinite others, not just the god hypothesis.
Bloody hell that’s a disturbing image. I haven’t seen anything as horrible as that since I took my son to a Discworld convention and met a guy in a bright green turtle suit trying to use a toilet.
This is written by two neurologists summarising their practical research into the many different facets of consciousness in humans and other species.
Most notable point of interest in both references is the independent development of consciousness in avian species. I wonder if they have a god? It would be a White Celestial Cockatoo no doubt. The most conspicuous feathered consciousness belongs to the magpie which has an enlarged segment of its brain, equivalent of the human frontal lobe. Bloody clever and cheeky buggers they are too.
Isn’t it funny how objective evidence is not sufficient for you to accept a simple fact, but you’ll believe in invisible sky fairies from a bronze age superstion with no evidence at all.
Since there is no evidence that consciousness has ever survived the death of the physical brain, I disbelieve your woo woo claim it exists independently of it.
You’re tedious rehashing of yet another argumentum ad ignorantiam fallacy speaks for itself.
The existence of physical brains, and consciousness are objective facts, you’re adding superstitious unevidenced woo woo, so the burden of proof is yours.
False equivalence fallacy again. Another asinine and irrational analogy, since we can demonstrate objective evidence that the music is not produced by the radio. So no, you never believed the radio produced the music. How many times are you going to dishonestly rehash these fallacious analogies after they’ve been debunked?
Showing examples of human design, that can be objectively evidenced, and then comparing those with nature where there is zero evidence of design, is an irrational fail, no matter how many times you plagiarise William Paley’s watchmaker fallacy.
Argumentum ad popular fallacy, the number of people who hold a belief as true tells us nothing about the validity of that belief. As has been explained to you more than once.
This being the case then this would suggest a creator - God , is the necessary agent for consciousness .
Nope, that is still pure unevidenced assumption, that you have tacked onto the end of your irrational fallacy.
Occam works for me . Anything v ZERO puts the balance in Gods favor.
Got any evidence to prove that matter produces consciousness?
You have violated Occam’s razor in almost every post you clown, by adding an invisible unevidenced deity, using inexplicable magic, based on naught but ignorant superstition.
How wonderfully ironic when advocates of life forces and spirit and sparks of the divine demand scientific evidence. The experiment has already been done and results are in. Form a rocky planet through accretion in the debris field surrounding a new star. Add copious amounts of water and then allow to simmer for eons in a dynamic environment bombarded with UV and static electricity. Wait for a couple of billion years and then check for signs of fossilized microbial life. Using a standard woo-woo meter, check for evidence of spirit infusion or fairy magic.
I anticipate that similar results may be found on Mars, Europa, etc., providing further evidence that life occurs spontaneously under the right conditions.
Mass = Energy (Einstein demonstrated this.) Not only is consciousness an emergent property of the brain but it is energy. We can measure brain activity. This emergent property of brain is energy and energy is mass. *You can disagree with Einstein. * We have the ability to measure brain activity. No brain activity and no consciousness. It’s really that simple
Basically, all that our porcine aeronaut has to offer, at bottom, can be summarised thus:
“I can’t understand how testable natural processes can produce X, therefore no testable natural process can produce X, therefore my cartoon magic man from my favourite mythology must have done it by magic”.
This would be hilarious if it wasn’t so pathetic and insidious.
If you haven’t seen it, there’s presently 4K video of the surface of mars on YouTube. Does my head in because it doesn’t look at all alien to me, looks like a desert. Half expect to see pottery shards.
The video below is only 10 minutes. There is 10 HOURS of film available. It occurs to me that it’s about time for the crazies to come out of the wood work and claim the Mars films are fake-------my computer monitor is only 1080p but that’s pretty good. Looks pretty good on a 4K TV, but not spectacularly better.
Location! Location! Location!
Prime real estate opportunity at Marathon Valley Twenty First and a Half Century Real Estate. Stunning views for the first comers, don’t hesitate, don’t be late.
Special discounts for theists. Send your deposit now to the address below for a shiny glossy brochure.
Don’t wait. Avoid the rush. Be the first on your block to say “I own a bit of Mars, isn’t that nice?”
You should devise a scam where you seek donations to send a stack of bibles to Mars.
eta: Or maybe a scheme to send William Lane Craig to Mars; where he can develop philosophical arguments about what is necessary and/or sufficient to survive there. I’m sure he could write several papers about the difference between a potential air tank, and an actual air tank.
Make sure you only contract with (lowest bidder) creationist engineering firms for the manufacture of his equipment.
I’m wondering how long it will be before some official American body begins selling land on Mars.Or naming rights to geographical features.
Closest I’ve come to that is buying a brick for me mum. It’s at the immigration museum in the city. It has her name and the date she arrived in Australia from Canada. It is then set into the ground to form part of a paved walk. I like to think of it as like the Hollywood walk of fame ,but with actual meaning.