Of course, another tactic to watch out for, is the one I refer to as “the creationist reboot”. This particular piece of duplicity arises, whenever a body of evidence refuting a creationist assertion is presented. What then happens is that [1] the creationist refuses even to acknowledge the existence of said presentation of refuting evidence, followed by [2] the creationist waiting until he/she thinks said presentation has been forgotten by the audience, followed by the resurrection of the previously refuted assertion as if it had never been addressed.
This tactic has been on display several times here already.