Here’s a clue for you. I provided this post elsewhere explaining what constitutes genuine evidence refuting or confirming an assertion.
Bullshit. We stand for discoursive honesty. Something you’ve never displayed here.
Projection, much?
Such as your snide attempt to dismiss my use of the Innes book as an example of factual documentation? Which you laughably tried to hand-wave away with a fake accusation of “appeal to authority”?
Projection time again.
What part of “there exist proper rules of discourse, and we understand them” are you trying and failing to evade here?
Funny how we can point to scientific backing for our statements. Unlike mythology fanboys.
Your duplicity isn’t.