You’re dishonesty is not a new narrative. The two commandments were missed, and I acknowledge that when I finally saw them, though you certainly remained inexplicably reticent for long enough.
You’ve been dishonest more than once, and with more than one poster. I have already highlighted a few.
this is not true.
I asked is there a rule concerning quoting the truth. i even gave an example.
Since your reply was not a NO, the mods have started an investigation, re-reading this entire thread and selecting the most outrageous lie. save the effort, as your quest is predicated on another false quote.
this would be the most egregious
lie as i made no complain but asked a question.
Since your reply was not a NO, the mods have started an investigation, re-reading this entire thread and selecting the most outrageous lie.
if your understanding of the nature of my question is any indication of your version of the truth, again don’t bother wasting your time. as one of you will no doubt cite my claim of god (despite any poof of my experience with God) will be enough.
This is simply par for the course when too many of the heavy hitters in a atheist forum can get a base hit. Gotta keep the foundational members happy
then you are incompetent and have completely mis read my post. go back and reread the post this time the whole thing… or maybe one of your peers who did read it can pm you and tell you, you have completely missed the mark here.
i answered that question… I check them out . followed their promises and nothing came of it. primarly because none of them offer anything or any proof in this life. where as God of the bible offers one on one contact. one you find god one tends to stop looking. so answered twice now
I believe David asked you if you wanted your accusation pursued, since you addressed it specifically more than once to the mods. he gave you the choice, his offer was pretty straightforward, no room for ambiguity.
You can’t possibly have done this with a significant number of all the deities humans have created?
A claim you still can’t demonstrate any objective evidence for don’t forget. The best you had beyond that bare claim was a bare appeal to numbers, or an argumentum ad populum fallacy.
may i also suggest (when the time comes) investing in a better forum format as this one is difficult and uninviting. it make work as a twitter type of out line but only because the posts are limited to so many characters. here walls of text are a natural result of the nature of discussion. there needs to be a better system of breaking that up. maybe having access post numbers and limiting posts 10 to a page would make doing what you are doing easier… especially when there are walls of text involved.
so that way rather than you being forced to read all of this crap, i could point out to you by citing my own post and page number that you have misconstrued/misrepresented my question, you see a challenge that does not exist and a call to action i never made… but now that you made such a big deal, you will be compelled to act no matter what.
while you are checking facts, my initial complain about mis quoting members will still go unaddressed simply because this format is garbage, and i can quickly direct you to the orginal offense and my question to you… one that you again blew way out of proportion
again dumb ass dishonesty is not the subject. misquoting other members is… again that is you and david propagating another narritive another lie another misquote!!! you people lie about other intentions so much you think it is the truth.
Again content accuracy was no my complaint it was the fact like you are doing now, I am being misquoted and misrepresented. people attributing words and ideas i never said and often times do not support!
This lying in the posts concerning general information is the next big misquoted lie! the new two verses narrative! and surprise surprise surprise you are at the forefront
My standard is set. Misquoting. For one, I haven’t really followed the thread in full (holidays, which I’m still on) … so setting aside biases, I’m off and running …
Post 12- @Drich off to a quoting start, but the quote boxes are missing the poster and arrow (I will give a “benefit of doubt” in his favor as he is new)
Post 20 - @Drich (still can’t get the hang of select “quote” when highlighting) … CONFUSING are you doing full quotes of members or are the grey boxes your own??? (Now I’m reading your comments; fuck me - trying to focus on your use of quotes BUT man talk about creating a mess for what should be an easy layout of “quote” and “respond”)
At the end of your post but your whole post seems to be in response (sort of) to “slavery” yet you ended it like this???
POST 22: [quote=“Drich, post:22, topic:1987”]
outlets.
Holy cow, Adam and Eve had children. They had children. Who do you think they had sex with in order to have children? what the problem is? adam and eve where not brother and sister. they were not clones… in fact we do not know what their relationship was outside of husband and wife as we do not have any tech that could duplicate this result.
[/quote]
From memory - you are quoting and responding to @David_Killens, but the “quote” job and your response misrepresents his point (straw-man). He specifically said “Adam & Eve’s children” would have children (the siblings with each other). YOU made it into a “Adam and Eve being siblings” (no dice).
… oh fuck - getting breakfast ordered and off to my day. Have fun @David_Killens
dummy i’m about to be bann because of people like you cant read and bitch to the management that i am lying… when the fault is with you… xs1/2 a dozen other people who either cant read or are blinded by such hate they see what they want… and i’m not supposed to make a big deal about it? i’m not supposed to draw attention to the fact i am right and all the noise and bitching and calling out and claims i am shifting the goal posts with david was in error from the beginning? Your error? that i now have to face being bann for.
I explained how to quote specific test to you in a way that shows the author and the post number, you ignored me, and continued to mix posters together in the same quote.
oh come now, you repeatedly made the accusation specifically asking the moderators. David asked you to say if you didn’t want to pursue it after all.
The format is exceptionally good, you just don’t know how to use it, and seem disinclined to take help when I offered it. However again you are misrepresenting David’s post, as he specifically said he would check all the posts. So nothing will be missed, that is axiomatic. I know David to be a man of his word.
Then use the hyperlink function, that is what it is there for.
Oh I think that is far from true, given how many times you repeated the question to the mods, and the fact that David specifically asked you if you wanted action taken or not, and that if you responded with a no he would do nothing.
and i said his assessment was in error… I simply asked is misquoting someone against the rules. i never asked for anyone to review the truth to every post in this thread.
Then why ask repeatedly, and to the mods? I believe David was pretty patient, and gave you every chance to withdraw. I also don’t understand what you’re worried about, David is very fair, and will be thorough?
While we’re waiting for David, which may take some time. You could tell me unequivocally (or not) why you think rape is wrong, beyond your adherence to divine diktat?
keep reading. i said once i found God i stopped looking. I reviewed all the major religions and stopped when i literally found God/he found me. studied judaism for 4 years at mt zion ministries, islam with a personal friend for 2 born into buddhism so had a familiarity with that, talked to family members still practicing, looked into shintoism but kept comming back to christianity. and again stopped looking when i was certain i found God.
A claim you still can’t demonstrate any objective evidence for don’t forget. The best you had beyond that bare claim was a bare appeal to numbers, or an argumentum ad populum fallacy.
all the evidence i needed was when i was sat before him, in judgement and again before a messenger when i decided this is what i was going to do with my life he sent a messenger to outline my past present and future without me saying 3 words… the whole exchange maybe 10-15 mins. watching these predictions come true over the years solidify my beliefs… which again happens over and over and over again for the last 2000 years to millions of people. this is not belief or faith sport, this is experiencing God enmasse. not a fallacy even if your are too immature to understand that.