Their is a possessive adjective, the correct syntax is are there no rules, not are their no rules, which is meaningless.
A word of advice you’re sawing the dishonest branch you’re sitting on with this rant.
I can tell you exactly what he’s talking about, I said he had condoned his deity drowning children, referencing Noah’s flood. I did this as he stated it was justified because he used a claim about people cannibalising children. Though Noah’s flood is of course a myth not supported by any of the geological evidence, it is asinine in the extreme to claim a global flood that rose 20ft above the highest mountain didn’t drown any children, as he has since ridiculously tried to claim.
Given his manifest dishonesty in misrepresenting several posters, I’d say his faux outrage was as you say an attempt to bully me, by inviting moderators to intervene.
One moderator who he grossly misrepresented already of course. So as you say @David_Killens the irony is pretty palpable.
Another irony overload, surely a lame attempt at humour.
Do you desire myself and the other mods to take action on lies, false claims and dishonesty? We can, by careful consideration and consultation, ban the most dishonest member in this thread.
Just a YES or NO. A long reply will result in sanctions.
If not a NO, the default is YES. It is YES because you advocated for action. If you do not reply with a NO (within 48 hours), then we shall take you up on your offer and sanction the most dishonest person in this thread.
If you dishonestly edit another member - that falls on YOU. Every skeptic member here has an ability to scroll up to see what was presented in text before the alter. Also, members that are misrepresented CAN quote themselves and call out the dishonest strawmanning that may have occurred.
Hate to break it to you - grownups think and can defend their positions. Mod job description isn’t one of “babysitting” membership use of expression when presenting ideas. (Only that of flagrant hate speech).
If it were you’d have gone long ago, it seems only you can’t see this. However I did not lie, I merely didn’t accept one of your asinine claims, but took you at your word the flood in the Noah myth was justified.
His “moral meter” is enraged with what is a small “personal, subjective” offence - BUT doesn’t flinch at rape, infanticide, slavery (except modern day “wage slaves” lol), human equality issues (women as property [ie rape]; or “homosexuality” )…
AND the book he uses for his “god-belief” is full of dishonesty and outright lies.
If you don’t like ad hominem you should have heeded my many warnings to you when you started using them, no point crying about it now. Your post was vapid ranting gibberish.
As for relevant points I have repeatedly asked you why you think rape is wrong, beyond blind adherence to divine diktat, and you have not once offered a cogent answer. In fact I’d bet a weeks wages you don’t understand the relevance of the question, judging from your responses.
I asked you to demonstrate some objective evidence for a deity, and you lied and said ti would be easy, then offered a subjective claim you’d experienced god. Then later denied you’d offered this as evidence for me.
In between I repeatedly warned you about your ad hominem attacks, and in the end returned them, and now you’ve turned into a crybaby about it, dishonestly pretending that you are blameless.
What is: i do not know what claim you are referring to it would be foolish for me to agree or disagree to anything at this point. can you provide a list of claims that you will be evaluating and some idea of the process?
that’s fine. all i wanted to know. thank you.
i was under a more oppressive forum rules for a long time and misquoting people was an instant bann. just wanted to see if this applied to everyone or no one.
Oh dear, there’s that dishonesty again. Not even close to what David said now is it. Though very telling you seem to have inferred who might be considered the most dishonest poster.
You suggested to the mods a requirement for “quoting the truth”. This is not an attack on you, this is the mods accommodating your suggestion.
Since your reply was not a NO, the mods have started an investigation, re-reading this entire thread and selecting the most outrageous lie.
At present we do not know what is the most outrageous lie and who stated it. Once we have concluded our investigation, WHICH WAS BORN FROM YOUR COMPLAINT, action will be taken.
If you believe your are not dishonest, no need for concern or a feeling of persecution. No one is after you. The mods are after the most dishonest person.
You obviously don’t know what Atheism is. You think you know. But you have no understanding of it.
i spent the 1st 1/2 of my life as an atheist. I beat and whaled on christians. vandalized the preachers car house and church. i have a general sense…
Except the book of Revelations. You argued that your unevidenced god was not omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and omniscient when it’s stated in Revelations verses 1:8, 21:6, and 22:13. If anything you seem pretty incompetent with your BIG JOB that YOU sound so proud of.
again a quoting lie. out right lie. maybe you are too stupid to tell the truth or maybe you evil heart will not all you to see it, but this is a lie. i said God is not omni max, then i said no where in the bible does it say God is all merciful/omnibenevolent nor all loving. everything else in your ‘recollection’ is a fabrication.
lets look at your verses:
you stupidity knows no bounds or the evil has binded you as rev 1:8 is the verse i referenced in saying God is the alpha and omega god, which is far more powerful than saying God is an omni max god.
8 “I am the Alpha and the Omega, [d]the Beginning and the End,” says the [e]Lord, “who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty.”
and again in verses 21:6 and 22:13 again supports everything i had to say. go back and reread what i wrote and fix this bs
I’m a liar? Fuck you buddy. I haven’t lied about a thing. You’re just trying to turn it all around on me. You’re a sore loser and a sociopathic narcissist.
member here has an ability to scroll up to see what was presented in text before the alter. Also, members that are misrepresented CAN quote themselves and call out the dishonest strawmanning that may have occurred.
)…
he uses for his “god-belief” is full of dishonesty and outright lies.