The answer is no, as indicated in the rest of the title.
Why did you select only the first few words of the title, while not highlighting the rest?
Furthermore, what about the body of the article? Not only does the title contrast your claim, but the body quite clearly does so.
~God is not even disappointed in Nyarlathotep. Nyarlathotep, you’re “not even wrong”.
Your account has been suspended for trolling until 8 am (not sure which time zone, sorry new feature) tomorrow. At that time, you’ll have another chance to answer.
I’m not sure they’re saying might be.
If I had to guess it’s because that’s where you made the claim you denied was anywhere in that article.
You are rapidly taking the title of most dishonest poster ever.
Accuse Nyar of…
WHEN YOU left out the word “apologize”.
When you apologize it means you regret;sorry;didn’t mean for…
The meaning in full of your statement is “you don’t mean for the title to be click bait”
YET YOU lie, twist and turn to say YOU meant for it to be click bait
YOUR lack of honesty and self-glorification; the twisting of words and meanings do make you VERY much like the name you adopted - oh, and about as “scientifically smart”…stick with your “god title name” IT SUITS YOU
If you won’t accept desperate and duplicitous semantics as currency, my guess is he is in real trouble, again.
Not to worry a computer genius will impose his will on the forum I’m sure…
Rampant insane egotism, and delusions of grandeur?
What do I win, what do I win??
Does anyone think that is a real photo of him in the OP? Or is he really David Icke?
Are you sure you are not a writer for Jimmy Carr? 
I’m open to offers, and I could certainly use the money…
I have never once claimed to be a genius. In fact, in the original post, I mentioned that I am of somewhat average brain function.
As another clear indication: My paper cited in the same 2019 article of mine cited by Nyarlayothep, is called: "A {hypothesis} on the {Supersymmetric artificial neural network}.
I have never once claimed that you claimed to be a genius.
Self promotion is a breach of forum rules, and you seem to have a lot of active links in that post to your own stuff, just saying.
~God approves 
Although, this comment of yours from another thread, seems to heavily imply that I supposedly want people to think I am some genius, despite the OP containing the sentence of mine: “I am of somewhat average brain function”.
Science is a method, it is neither true nor false, though there are accepted scientific facts, and I believe these to be valid, do you?
**NB I HAVE NEVER CLAIMED SCIENTIFIC FACTS ARE VALIDATED BY OUR BELIEF OF THEM, THAT IS AN ABSURD AND DISHONEST NOTION YOU HAVE CONCOCTED. **
As others have pointed out on these forums, it is quite important to have our definitions standardized.
What precisely do you mean by the phrase “Supersymmetry found”?
@ GodBennett
You can try to answer the question again in 6 months.
GodBennettAtheist
Wait! Wait! I got it! You failed first grade and simply spelled DoG backwards!
Do I win?
