And how many of the 30,000 authors went into a small forum like this and boasted on how wonderful they are?
I interact with a few reputable scientists, and not one has an ego so large they feel a need to brag to laymen.
1 Like
If you recall, my Covid19 Ai thread asked members here to participate/contribute. Idk whether people here do computer science.
Read the sign on the door. It says “Atheist Forum”, not “Computer Science Forum”.
I don’t go to a plumber’s forum to get answers on quantum mechanics … do you grasp this example?
2 Likes
Then stick to the forums where you “know” they “know” this type of stuff…
He’d be too easily found out.
Yah…it’s been done here by laymen. Lol
No peer review, that says it all.
1 Like
What does it say?
God permits you to in this case, explain your feelings.
It’s okay to give your thinking even if you don’t do computer science, nor understand that over 30,000 covid19 research papers were released since January, and many were not peer reviewed.
- As long as you repeat those types of comments, God shall simply quote the above.
I already have. For example, one of my projects is featured by multi-billion dollar company NVIDIA.
In a way, I was “found” or discovered, by NVIDIA’s team.
As long as you repeat those types of comments, I’ll repeat the point above.
Hey! Why did I get this Tattoo of Tin Man on my butt?
Well, long ago Asthma was considered a disease. I redefined the God concept. There was no scientific evidence why I should not. Modern computer software simulations are just like tin men. I am a human with average brain function but for those times I am a chimp without significant brain damage.
Relevant Souse by myself. So the only choice was to get a Tin Man Tattoo on my ass!
1 Like
Well, I hope you got my good side, at least. 
There’s a good side???
@Whitefire13 Re: “There’s a good side???”
Well, sure. (But only when compared to the other sides.)
Wait wait wait: are you guys suggesting that the person who claimed to have “found Supersymmetry” with their “String theory powered supersymmetric artificial neural network”; might be full of shit? 
4 Likes
In that article of mine, are any claims made that supersymmetry was found, i.e. the Supersymmetry that Witten/Physics people seek to find?
For those who won’t click the link cited by the other forum user above:
~God is quite disappointed in Nyarlatothep.
Lolol, as I mentioned in the very line after that title, that title was meant to be “clickbait”.
Really. From whence did you get the quaint notion that Nyarlathotep or anyone else here has an obligation to meet your expectations?
Pretty sure you have reached the expectations of most of us. IE None. Of course that changed after reading a few of your posts. I think it was expected you would continue as you began.
In that regard you have certainly reached my expectations. Right now I still don’t know if you are as mentally unwell as your posts infer or just another troll. I guess you could be both
Why yes, I did initially consider there might be something of value hidden within the chaff of your posts. If there is, it’s buried far too deep for me to know where to even start looking.–People here I trust have said your maths and attempts at science are nonsense.
And that has been demonstrated to be false
As another example, I am the only one here who has been demonstrated for eg, to have science work of mine featured by multi-billion dollar company NVIDIA.
People here may not like that, but such is reality regardless.
~God is not even disappointed in boomer47. Boomer47, you’re “not even wrong”.
Yes or No: did you claim in the title, that supersymmetry had be found? Think carefully before you answer this question.
1 Like