By describing it as a lie you are making a claim. It seems you want to hide behind semantics though, rather than admit you can’t demonstrate any objective evidence that life has any overarching meaning.
As I said, the evidence though not conclusive, is that humans evolved like all living things, and evolved just 200k years ago. If human life has a meaning, other than the meaning we arbitrarily attach to our own lives, then that fact seems at odds with the claim.
FWIW, we already know you’re a theist, it’s in your profile, thus these semantics smack of sophistry to me. It is a common tactic very much in vogue in religious apologetics, to make these attempts to reverse the epistemological burden of proof that their beliefs carry.