I will be sure to do my research on that.
I do, how’d you know? Are you a psychic? Did the toilet god tickle you like every priest at a catholic curch? Give you a gift?
I usually refrain from this sort of thing but you came to this debate with rudeness and a claim of literally meeting “god” I accept my humble defeat on my claims as I wasn’t prepared and just wanted to hear from like minded people and those people delivered really well. Pro debaters for sure.
Well, yes. But it wasn’t that. I’m just good at reading people.
That’s kind of out of line. I joke that you might have trust issues, and you come back joking about molestation? Funny! Ha! I was molested! Isn’t that just hilarious? You’ve got some mother issues too, I can see. Momma didn’t give you much milk as a suckling, did she?
You said you had some kind of theory which, if not disproven, would “blow away” theists … so … where is it? I haven’t seen a crumble of anything, apart from you anthropomorphizing sky scrapers …
Is this “foreplay”? What’s going on …? let’s get to the meat … ehh? Let’s tango … let’s get spicy … where’s the beef? Out with it, suckling. Momma’s teets are getting sore waiting for you to get to the point. Ha!
You claimed to have “met god” like he’s the homie and then when asked for evidence you attacked me. Instantly getting defensive to my question of curiosity proves that you’re not interested in proper debate. My retort was making a comparison between your claim of being fiddled by “toilet god” to how the catholic church has the worlds biggest sex scandel. Ps you know who doesn’t? Satan! Just kidding it was a joke not a dick don’t take it so hard. 
The quote function appears on your phone as well, when you highlight text.
Your clam here:
…is unfalsifiable.
Well the claim seemed very specific, are you now recanting the claim you can “prove that no deity of any kind exists”?
Well, let me ask you … under what conditions do you imagine a person might meet God? I ask because I don’t entirely think you realize that “‘meeting God” will be hard to support with “rock hard” dick … erm … sorry … evidence. I meant “evidence”. Like, if you are expecting video evidence, it just doesn’t work that way … so … yeah … how do you imagine people “meet God”?
No. I’m interested. However, you’re the person claiming to have the “black box” that reveals the truth about theism being falsifiable, not me. I’m more interested in hearing that theory than explaining my experiences with the divine.
No. Satan is a butt fucker. Tried and true. I’ll have to disagree with you there.
Ahh. Insult to injury. The best form of revenge. Tushy, good sir. Tushy.
Ah yes I apologize I am attending this debate while also doing manual labor at my job. To understand that claim I was underlining that if the existence of the god I am claiming might be real can be disproven then all gods from any faith can. But I’m also arguing strongly for the case of it’s existence. I will be unable to provide evidence until I run tests. This hypothesis is in its infancy and needs to be polished. I’m also trying do distance myself from pantheism even though this would be a template fir that “god”
And why doesn’t it work that way? Can you enlighten me on how it works because every other case its within a persons head while they have a Schizophrenic Discourse with themselves thinking its god. I’ve had an experience that was quite visual and philosophical but I don’t base my world view off of it because I need to challenge my sences. They lie to us all the time an example of that is I have cronic dpdr disorder. The way I experience the world when it happens is something I can’t even verbalize it is so unsettling when you feel unreal. But i also understand what it is and don’t assume any beliefs off of it.
I haven’t really asked you what faith are you a part of? You seem comfortable enough to bully and be rude so I’m assuming it can’t be Christianity because you would forgive me and uphold the standard by which your god demands. But you also address Satan as though its real and even insult “him”. Why? What is your angle?
I just don’t think God is interested in revealing Himself unless absolutely necessary. And, as that seems to be the case, when he in fact does reveal himself it isn’t in a way that anyone else would notice besides the person revealed to. Hence schizophrenics are so often labeled as insane because no one is willing to lend them credence when they announce that they’ve been acquainted with a higher being.
Uhh. Well. Satanic, Christ Consciousness, Evil Clowns, big fan of the Buddha, and partial to Ha Thada. Also a devotee of Shiva the Creator, Shiva the Destroyer, and Shiva the Dancer.
Name a Buddhist attainment and I’ve experienced it.
I don’t follow any faith. I cultivate five spiritual faculties: kindness; compassion; grace; sympathetic joy; and equanimity
I practice the four jhanas (you can look that term up for your self).
I cultivate the escape from suffering know as the “deathless” in Buddhism. It’s an inclination of the mind made possible by meditative absorption.
More of a Christian than most. Between you and me, all of this banter is just shits and giggles. I’m a human. I like to take the piss out. See? We’re actually being civil now. Even after the rough housing. That’s generally how it works on the playground.
Satan is extremely real to me. I have a very long and extended relationship with him. He holds me to an extremely high standard of ethics, which I strive to reach and uphold daily. I’m basically running under his “programme” - a very strict and unforgiving “sink or swim” clinic in the spiritual. Recall that Satan was regarded highly in the Old Testament. All of this new age bullshit about Satan being the source of all evil is a crock of shit. He is very misunderstood and those who fail to give him his due respect are bound for a big suprise when it comes time to pay him his due.
No angle whatsoever. Just waiting for the bomb to drop. Living it one day at a time. Shooting the shit with atheists under the guise of a madman who used to be one. What’s yours?
You have also now accepted the claim that “not deity of any kind exists” is unfalsifiable, so as I asked several times, how do you plan to falsify an unfalsifiable claim exactly?
This makes less and less sense, you’re arguing that a specific type of deify exists, while simultaneously claiming that you can prove that no deity of any kind exists. Those claims are mutually exclusive?
What kind of test can falsify an unfalsifiable claim? No offence, but this is sounding like a windup.
I have seen no hypothesis, just sweeping bare claims, at least one of which you have accepted is unfalsifiable, so no testing of its veracity would be possible, by definition.
I have no idea what relevance it has, when you already claimed you can “prove that no deity of any kind exists”.
Atheist too, but I’ve toyed with “god” as maybe a cosmic force, not a sky daddy. What’s your physical, non-intelligent “god” look like? Gimme the minimum to call it “god,” and I’ll swing at it