Meanwhile, it’s indicative once again, of how being a mythology fanboy has destroyed not only your critical faculties, but your basic human curiosity, and replaced both with a blind, facile attachment to the “Magic Man did it” mantra.
You see, with respect to the matter of the possibility of life being found on bodies other than Planet Earth, we have an entire thread devoted to this. Which you manifestly never bothered to look for, despite it appearing fairly frequently in the “latest threads” list, for example.
In that thread, I devoted an extensive dissertation to the approach being taken by scientists on this matter, with respect to the possibility of indigenous life forms being found in the future in the subsurface oceans of Europa and Enceladus here in the Solar System. Along with a discussion of the formidable technical difficulties that need to be overcome for certain types of mission to those bodies.
You’ll find said dissertation here.
Note that I stated therein, that I would actually be more excited if missions to either of those moons found a fully functional RNA world, because this would kill stone dead any doubts about the viability of prebiotic chemistry research. A fully functional RNA world found on either Europa or Enceladus would vindicate the decades of research by such people as Jack Szostak and Gerald F. Joyce, much of which I’ve covered in other dissertations here.
The irony applicable here, is that it was hearing the pontifications of mythology fanboys like you, that motivated me to check actual peer reviewed scientific papers, and determine whether or not said mythology fanboys were uttering anything remotely substantive. Whereupon I found that they were all lying.
Numerous specimens of your ilk have gatecrashed this and other rationalist forums, peddling the usual duplicitous apologetic fabrications in a vain attempt to dismiss cosmological physics, prebiotic chemistry and evolutionary biology, and all of them have lied through their teeth on these matters.
It’s amusing to see so many of your ilk treat the Ninth Commandment from the mythology they claim to be upholding, as discardable whenever it suits their apologetic convenience.
You might want to consider how badly this reflects not only upon the perpetrators of the aforementioned discoursive offences, but the religion they think they’re “defending” via said conduct.
Thus far, you’ve been fortunate in that your discoursive deficiencies have been primarily those of ignorance and indolence, though in a world where proper science education is freely available from a huge number of reputable sources, these are far from forgivable.
You are strongly advised to note, that several of us here are veteran observers of duplicity on the part of pedlars of apologetics, in some cases able to call upon decades of accumulated data in this regard. Yet others have benefited from a properly constructed, rigorous scientific education, and view darkly the dishonest treatment of science as a branch of apologetics by the usual suspects.
The short version: don’t bring a peashooter to an ICBM exchange.