I never said it was an entirely subjective experience, and again if you want to study the phenomenon of gender dysphoria from the standpoint of psychiatry, then go do so.
I think I already covered your denial of a broad scientific consensus, and I am dubious that your “brief look” was as rigorous and thorough as the research the field of physiatry has conducted, in order to reach that consensus.
Ironically what you have just offered is an known common logical fallacy, called an argument from personal incredulity. You need to either stop invoking logic, or gain a basic understanding of it.
Well there you go then. It would be risible to imagine you have subjected this topic to the kind of rigour, that the entire scientific field of psychiatry has, in order to form a broad consensus.
Nope sorry, you have done neither.
Straw man fallacy.
it doesn’t need to be clear to you, only to science. How many established scientific facts are thoroughly conversant with, or care to be so, why does this particular scientific fact, stick in your craw exactly?
Does that have any relevance to gender dysphoria, if so what is it?
As I said you might have gender dysphoria, but either way it’s not my place to judge. You seem to be suggesting that the only way you know you’re a man, is by looking at your genitalia, if this is true, I have no explanation, as being a man is part of who I am, even without looking at my bits.
Again this sort of information must abound on the internet, type gender identity into Google, and off you go. Societal norms, as I explained right at the start, can be subjective, and have no relevance, being gay is not the norm, being short is not the norm, no one I suspect would suggest this means there are no gay or short people, or that gay or short people should not be treated equally and with respect.