That’s still a no true Scotsman fallacy, you are simply biased and want to insist anyone who doesn’t share your position must be using flawed reasoning, but given you are using a known logical fallacy to express it, and nothing else, not one shred of objective evidence to support the claim, or your claim a deity exists outside of your imagination.
Worse still when asked what your criteria then is, for all the thousands of deities you disbelieve, the same number as me but one, you answered with a single word “evidence”, if you can’t see how risible that is, then accusing atheists of poor reasoning is equally laughable.
You cannot demonstrate this, what’s more You can’t offer any explanation of how your deity exists, where it came from, how it created anything. So the double standard is again risible.
I am inclined to agree unfortunately the pernicious influence of religions is adept at creating closed minds that reason poorly in its followers.
That we know of, and of course neither do deities that we know of, outside of the human imagination.
Circular reasoning fallacy., that of course would not evidence a deity anyway. This claim would have to be demonstrated not asserted, and again we now know your god claim explains nothing.
- How is a deity possible?
@Sherlock-Holmes [Which part are you struggling with?] - Where did this deity come from?
@Sherlock-Holmes [I don’t know] - How is the supernatural power to create a universe possible?
@Sherlock-Holmes [Why is anything possible] - Where does the supernatural power to create a universe come from?
@Sherlock-Holmes [From outside the universe] - How did a deity use supernatural powers to create the universe.
@Sherlock-Holmes [By the use of will]
That explains nothing about the origins of the universe.
And all of them are weak, poorly reasoned or irrational.