Yes I saw the claim, and you then contradicted with a special pleading fallacy for your deity, claiming it had always existed, also contradicting two previous claims:
Leaving aside these are strident assumptions unsupported by any objective evidence, or rational argument, you seem to be contradicting yourself all over the place, and not just on this either.
A dubious assertion, since you have no idea what existed before the big bang, and of course you are using it as an argumentum ad ignorantiam fallacy, no natural explanation = god using inexplicable and unevidenced supernatural powers, and a false dichotomy fallacy either your belief or a straw man you think you can easily knock over.
This has been explained enough times now, to make it odd to say the least that you persist with the same logical fallacies.
Oh I think that’s an extremely disingenuous and dubious claim, given where you are and what your clear agenda is. You may not have specifically mentione dit there, but to deny that’s where this nonsense is heading seems an unlikely assertion.
All that aside though, you still made yet again several obvious contradictions, and used several logical fallacies in your arguments. You can’t have it all ways, demanding explanations science doesn’t currently have or leaping to conclusions based on that gap in our knowledge, and at the same time have no explanation at all for your core claim a god did it all. Lets remind ourselves how that went:
Imagine science were offering an explanation of the big bang comparable to that nonsense:
- How is TBB possible?
Science [Which part are you struggling with?] - Where did TBB come from?
Science [I don’t know] - How is the power of TBB possible?
Science [Why is anything possible] - Where does power for TBB come from?
Science [From outside the universe] - How did TBB create the universe.
Science [By the use of will]
The irony is palpable…especially when you assert that
Then claim a deity has always existed and always will.