Actually I could not make it through the whole thing. Wow! Is this guy a nutjob? or what? I think he has a screw loose. This was actually some of the scariest shit I have ever heard put into psychobabble.
More scary was the fact that all the comments were positive. Mine was not.
[
@k.m.h3458](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJpAcWNVKRYtdMhVr3fdB2g)
What identity should be and ought to be is a mindset that directly opposes the idea of faith being the courage to accept future possibilities with open arms. One cannot run around âshould-ingâ and âought to-ingâ about the world around them, and simultaneously be open to possibilities of the future.
He asserts that âFaith is courageous.â Applying âshouldâ and âought toâ to the future is courageous? It is the best way to deal with the future? Really? I find it hard to believe that any psychotherapist would make such a statement.
Existence itself is good? This is indicative of a ridged model of black-and-white thinking. It assumes, âgood exists.â Good is not a thing. It is a label we attach to the world around us. When we like something we call it good. When we think something is useful or helpful to ourselves or others, we call it good. Existence is both good and bad and sometimes one personâs good is another personâs bad? This absolutist thinking, "Existence is good,â is frankly, bizarre, when it comes from someone supposedly educated.
A vision? A vision in which we have the responsibility of making the vision a reality? I guess we are right back to Jordanâs âshouldâ and âought to universe.â Isnât this a bit on the repressive side? A vision based on should and ought to. This is just a weird position. IMO
Identity is the proper union (no idea what proper means) of faith and responsibility. Responsibility to make the should and ought to manifest in the future. This man is sick! Can you not see how insane his message is? No wonder he needs training to keep his license. This âfolksâ is whack-job bullshit.
I have not watched much of Jordan, but I am really unimpressed.