Why did you clip the quote, I have added the emboldened part you omitted, and as anyone can see it’s not trolling as I quoted your post making the claim? Here it is again then:
Wrong answer, it is absurd to imagine evasion is more honest than clarity and frankness in a debate.
Nonsense, no one here will care which deity you imagine to exist, especially as you have already admitted you know of no objective evidence for any deity. They’d likely have thought better of you if you were honest and frank, and stated plainly which deity you believe exists, and why.
Not sure why you imagine I needed your approval to disbelieve your unevidenced assertions, or why you’d imagine I thought you were seeking my approval, but you’re mistaken on both counts, honest debate and the truth are all I ever want.
The rest of my post obviously, that you clipped again, I have underlined the part that added context, and this yet again seems to be a dishonest attempt to misrepresent what I said, by removing the context, in what I can only infer is another attempt to provoke a reaction. You are not debating honestly. Hell, you’re not debating at all. Every response is pure obfuscation, but yet you respond anyway. FWIW, I imagine many posters are cringing at this point, at your attempts to troll, like that gif, which is not fooling anyone, and will no more get a rise out of me than your other attempts.
What deity did you claim has “ordained everything that is written”? Why do you believe this, and why do you believe a deity exists? There is nothing discourteous in asking someone to explain and evidence their claims, least of all in a pubic debate forum.
If you think you can provoke me by being dishonestly evasive, then I can only assure you it will not happen, I have seen this tactic too many times to fall for it.