That’s not us, go find those guys… You are straw manning; you cannot tell me what I believe. I know many atheists, none of them make that claim. Some do, but once again, not us.
Here is another definition, bigotry: “obstinate or unreasonable attachment to a belief, opinion, or faction, in particular prejudice against a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular group”
You came here to educate what you perceived as being the “dumb” atheists. You instead have shown your own ignorance and biases with using logical fallacies to justify your beliefs to a group of people you believe are inferior to you.
I don’t know what you don’t understand about this. I have never seen evidence for purple, invisible elephants and I don’t know what the evidence would look like. So I lack belief in purple, invisible elephants. What is wrong with this logic? What am I missing here?
False.
Major Premise: The natural world exists.
Minor Premise: There are things about the natural world we don’t understand.
Conclusion: Therefore, god exists.
This is a post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy, you are assuming the source and committing a logical fallacy, not using logic. You are at ignorance claiming to be at knowledge. Just because we know the universe exists, doesn’t mean something externally exists to that. Another problem is that this becomes an infinite regress. Who created god? Who created that god? The fact is that we don’t know. If something is complex and something even more complex created that, why does that just get to have always existed? That’s not logical. You choose to pick god for the stopping place (faith). The fact is you don’t know just like the rest of us. We don’t believe in things that can be easily made up and can’t be known.
You are basically trying to say that god exists and we need no evidence for it (FAITH). At least some of the religious people you made fun of above know they are using faith. You are using it and thinking you are using logic.