How to recognize evidence for God

[Sheldon]

@Sheldon

If I make a claim, as with most of the atheists here, and that claim was demonstrated as either erroneous or dubious, I would certainly consider retracting or amending that claim, if one is open minded of course.

Instead you offer this nonsense:

@Sherlock-Holmes

Let’s try another way to get through then, I’m sure it will sink in eventually, just keep trying.

The law of non contradiction:

@Sherlock-Holmes

I made no claims about…these initial beliefs…or what led to them

Yes you did, here:

@Sherlock-Holmes

unless we have an initial belief we cannot develop new beliefs.

Here you admit you don’t now where those initial beliefs come from, you cannot RATIONALLY claim where they come from, and claim not to know.

@Sherlock-Holmes

@Sheldon

where does that initial belief come from?

I have no idea,

That’s two contradictions you made right there, and you seem to think you can ignore the fact this makes your claims irrational, while creating straw man non-sequiturs about how we form logical beliefs.

Ignoring irrational contradictions in your claims is not a very compelling stance for all neutral observers you claimed you could convince, anymore than lying you hadn’t made the claim about the origins of initial beliefs.