@David_Killens It’s his ego … 
. Just putting in filler so I can reply 
1 Like
NewSkeptic,
I suggest that you get a new pair of glasses forthwith! If you really look in this thread, it was your cohorts that got your topic off track FIRST by doing their perceived comedy routine towards me, get it? Furthermore, I engaged you in actually telling you that subjectively it is important to name which God you were referring too, because it does matter, remember? Then almightydog took your thread in another direction and it went from there.
Therefore, don’t forget to tell dogalmighty and friends the next time not to do interrupt your thread. I was just defending my position as anyone would do.
.
No running away on my part…you have still chosen not to engage my questions to you. You are just using people as springboards to relentlessly and dishonestly push your claimed ideals…that people have known about and understood long before you claimed them as your own…and dictated they are the only true way to confront belief in gods. I explained to you why I disagree with you, cogently and concisely…yet you refuse to engage my explanation to you. Why is that? Seeing you are failing miserably at that, I am trying to understand your solipsistic grandiose behaviour…upon some review, you clearly land on the NPD platform.
Your engagement added nothing to the thread, you just have one particular issue you are going to spout no matter the topic. It was not important in the context of this thread to weasel all the imagined gods down to one as no two people ever completely agree on all aspects of the definition.
1 Like
Oh, now I feel a Voltaire quote coming on again…
“Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities , Can Make You Commit Atrocities”
1 Like
.
Whitefire13,
YOUR SPECIFIC QUOTE ONCE AGAIN FOR THE LAST TIME SO AS TO SAVE YOU FURTHER EMBARRASMENT: “Personally, my goal is to get as “close to what is true” as possible and I engage others with that same intention (until they do not act with integrity) …”
QUOTE: UNTIL THEY DO NOT ACT WITH INTEGRITY, which in turn specifically states in correct syntactical sentence structuring, you do not engage them anymore if they don’t act with integrity, then you RUN AWAY from them! 2+2=4.
Enter this Reading Comprehension Class ASAP!
.
You are rather proving her point by dishonestly misrepresenting her reluctance to engage with liars as running away, rather than Whitefire13 simply being smart enough to see the folly in attempting honest debate with someone who has no integrity.
2 Likes
.
NewSkeptic,
YOUR INSIDIOUS QUOTE: “Your engagement added nothing to the thread, you just have one particular issue you are going to spout no matter the topic. It was not important in the context of this thread to weasel all the imagined gods down to one as no two people ever completely agree on all aspects of the definition.”
Seriously, I accept your complete ignorance relative to the Bible where your assumed intellect upon said topic goes severely wanting, whereas IT DOES MATTER in what God anyone is talking about relative to the topic at hand, especially when referring to a God like you did in your initial posts disgusting subject matter!!! Be continually ignorant at your expense on your topic, it matters not to me.
.
Hey 21,
Imagine every verbal perjorative and visual obscenity being aimed at your pompous head. It’s clear you lack any humanity and just view these discussions as mental masturbation. I kindly suggest the physical kind would give you a better outcome.
1 Like
In my defence I’m hardly alone in fighting an up hill battle to be funny alongside the comedy gold of your posts. A troll who starts by admitting they are a lying troll…I mean who can write material like that, it’s cut the comedy legs from under me.
21stCenturyIconoclas, you actually get paid for doing so?
Nope, unless the belly laughs your guff has produced could be considered payment.
2 Likes
You obviously didn’t understand why newsceptic originally disagreed with you, long before I responded. When I did respond, I disagreed with you, for the exact same reason as newsceptic did. Huh, two people disagreeing with you, for the same reason… which really seems to be an issue for you. (cognitive dissonance much?) At that point you refuse to engage my explanation, dispense with reason, and ad hominumed your way into the hearts of many, with your solopsistic grandiose behavior…hence you clearly led me to asking you about NPD…cuz the shoe seems to fit.
1 Like
.
Sheldon,
We all apply our trade differently, and if I was in a situation of "Oh no, the pseudo-christian is not acting with integrity anymore, shit, now what, boo hoo? This is where I use that insidious notion and literally go for the kill shot by using the Bible against them. If they do not agree with the specific and appropriate passages that I use for the situation, then they are calling Jesus a LIAR which is another kill shot at their expense to come forth. LOL
I perceive that most Atheists in this forum are not truly Bible astute to be able to use the Bible against the pseudo-christian, and at their embarrassing expense. 
.
Well, NewSkeptic …unfortunately “death” is the great equalizer- shows no preference for age, health, sex, personality, intelligence, etc.
Another reason, I lean towards the “no god most likely” category.
Again, I am sorry for your loss (the purpose of this thread) and my unfortunate engagement off topic.
There are other threads and other days to engage assholes.
2 Likes
I’m not sure it’s assumption, are you sure you’re not really a theist? All the signs are there.
2 Likes
Oh fuck!!! Ohhhh fuck !!! 
I Jesus fuckin’Christ can’t help myself (sorry NewSkeptic…just one more - just one 
)
@Century21…should I point out your “disgusting” subject matter three or is it four times - or did you MEAN something else? Hmmm, reading is best absorbed with comprehension. Asshole!
1 Like
Your trade is lying and trolling, you said so, so we ply a very different trade. Though I hold little hope this fact will ever register through your impenetrable ego. Try starting your own blog, you can post your disjointed rants in it? I don’t think debate is for you.
Impressive, your ego I mean, not that self aggrandising ode to your perception of your own genius, that is rather sad. I bet theists everywhere are shaking like a shitting dog though.
Oh bless, you don’t perceive anything champ, least of all about the posters here, that much is self evident.
3 Likes
Sorry for engaging off topic.
I wish there was a disagree button on this new site…it likely would have saved your thread, at least on my part.
Fucking intelligent humour Sheldon - it’ll fly over dipshit’s head (edited emoji) 
Pearls before swine, but he clearly is not part of my target audience. I managed to get osteopathic treatment today, first time in over 3 months because of Covid lock down, so I’m on something of a codeine high at the minute, until my back calms down a little. Humour is all I have left at the minute, and a nice Shiraz… 
Whoa, shiraz and opioids can occasionally = the big sleep.