God's plan for Emily

.
Sheldon,

In your response to your post #158:

First off, the downturn started with adogalmighty’s post #25 where I was cordial up to this point, and if you can’t see this, then I suggest that you make an appointment with Lenscrafter’s to get a new pair of reading glasses post haste. Then, the irony in subsequent posts is the fact that you joined in and became what you’re allegedly against!!! Priceless hypocritical action on your part.
You take the boring position of being in a “robot rut” where when you discuss a persons religion you want them to demonstrate sufficient objective evidence, and if they can’t, you disbelieve their claim, and thats it! Poof, you’re done! HELLO? lol

Take for instance the Christian faith, and using your embarrassingly weak way of discussion towards this faith, and when you reach your roadblock as described above, the pseudo-christian will always revert back to the core of their pagan belief which is the JUDEO=Christian Bible. This is where I and many others ONLY attack their faith with a take no prisoners action as you remove yourself to sit upon the sidelines.

ZEUS FORBID , we do this in various ways of either being an Atheist, a POE, working in reverse as a TRUE Christian that accepts Jesus biblically as a serial killer, abortionist, murderer of innocent children, racist, vengeful, etc., and the outcome of this position, or whatever other entity we choose, it matters not. The main concern is the end result, where every course the pseudo-christian takes in their insipid refutation, it is biblically countered with the direct and inspired words of their NAMED GOD to tie them up with no escape route using their own Bible!

You admit in your post #28 within this thread, even though it was a weak position that you used in trying to prove your point, that “you are not sure” if mentioning the name of said god has validity. Whereas in practice and knowing said Gods inspired words to use against the pseudo-christians position, is subjectively does 110 percent!

In simpler terms, you can only go so far as tiringly shown, whereas I and others either have to finish the job in your behalf, or use our initial position at the onset to do more damage than you could ever do with your described old ways modus operandi!

In closing, I can only assume that you have bathed yourself is so much circular reasoning over the years, that you are unaware that it is so much a part of you! Therefore, to use the same, you take the easy way out and are the number one user of circular reasoning on Atheist-Republic, bar none! Congratulations!

.