You’re right. I apologise, and should know better.
.
dogalmighty.,
Tell me is you’ve heard these entities before relative to your weak MO?
-
Your use of circular reasoning until the cows come home to TRY and save what face you have left.
-
Your habitual use of the continued acronym of “NPD” because you have nothing else to say.
-
You mentioning that debate is not for me? Whereas, in any debate regarding Christianity, I would easily own you, to the point where to make it almost even for you, I would blindfold myself, tie my hands behind my back, and type with my feet! Then and only then, you may have a chance!
Well, as we can see, there is hardly any fish left in the barrel subsequent to me easily killing them. BUT, where some still hang on like ol’ mydogalmighty is trying in vain to do, so let’s give him a hand! APPLAUSE SIGN IN ON!
.
.
.
Nyarlathotep,
YOUR QUOTE SUBSEQUENT TO YOU RUNNING AWAY FROM MY QUOTE TO YOU: “The trolling is getting a bit much. Please knock it off.”
At least you knew when to quit to save any further embarrassment, good for you!
I am sure you are going to tell your cohorts in crime the same thing, correct? Its about time they stop trolling as well, yes? I have given them enough bloodiness for the entire month, so please, SAVE THEM! Thanking you in advance.
.
Oh, it’s too late for an apology.
You can expect a visit from our Master at arms, Maurice. As usual, Maurice will be accompanied by Algernon,the attack ferret. Maurice will also be carrying his little black suitcase, containing a small mallet and a pineapple.
I’d hide under my bed If I was you.
Sounds like an average Friday night to me. 
1 Like
Remaining forum members, as explicitly shown, do you have enough proverbial egg upon your face in trying in vain to engage 21C? Had enough?
I, as only one person, took on a “plethora” of feeble attempts with this forum’s Atheists, where it wasn’t truly fair whatsoever!!! With that being said, you Atheists needed more members present to help save yourselves when engaging me! 
Oh well, live and learn. Go heal yourselves up so you can fight another day.
.
Just briefly back on topic.
The Jews believe YHWH can do whatever he likes including sending all of Jewry into the Holocaust. He is God Almighty for a reason. Guilty.
Jesus’s dad has an alibi for all deaths; he exists outside time and space, no witnesses however, and in any case the deaths don’t matter because he claims to be so loving everyone he has killed will, at sometime, get some sort of eternal afterlife as reward or punishment. Guilty.
Allah on the other hand is enmeshed within reality and therefore all and anything that happens is an expression of his will. Guilty.
All three are guilty of genocide and when you are omnipotent, as the old song goes, “it really doesn’t matter which cide you’re on”. There is no point mounting a CSI investigation to target a particular conviction. All three suspects have made their own detailed confessions in writing no less.
And not least, of ultimate importance is the fact that none of the usual suspects exist.
People die, undeniable fact, and there is no divine perp, because there is nothing divine.
All of your posts, 21st, even your non-defensive ones, reveal an distinctive aggressive, combatative attitude that is never conducive to productive discoursive debate. I don’t apologise for my outlook or style not being as aggressive as yours.
But I don’t see even the most resistant theist as the enemy to be ridiculed or embarrassed, as much as I see them as victims of dangerous mythical belief systems.
Do you ever find yourself arguing with recorded phone messages?
2 Likes
The whole part about objective metaphysics has me stumped.
Seriously 21st what is this fixation of yours for stripping naked and writhing on floors at parties? I can do this without making claims about my beliefs, but to suggest that because you misread something in the Bible gives you some divine legal pass to do so won’t wash either with the arresting officers or the magistrate.
As for making even pseudo Christians feel embarrassed it would only be on your behalf.
When does this compelling argument for the case for atheism actually start?
1 Like
It doesn’t, and I’d also be more inclined to believe he had some tangible insight into the bible if he could actually spell, and didn’t keep misspelling words like striping (sic) for example.
That’s very kind, I am quite fond of coconut icing.
You’re not the only one to have mentioned this. It’s still unclear what he hope’s to gain from attacking everyone, but judging from yesterday’s display I’d say trolling was the only motive that could rationally be inferred.
1 Like
Ummmm, it may just be who he is. Significant cognitive dissonance is one of the traits of severe narcissism…especially when confronted with disagreement…their point of view either has to be acknowledged in some way, or they continue on in an ad hominem whirlwind of, usually, grandiose egotism…which is a byproduct of the issue. Fun.
1 Like
Oh no, good sir, this is excellent. I own stock in Orville Redenbacher popcorn, and sales have spiked since our little tantrum-throwing loud child has shown up. This is comedic gold.
1 Like
Grinseed,
YOUR QUOTE: "Seriously 21st what is this fixation of yours for stripping naked and writhing on floors at parties? "
Uh, look up the term “facetious.”
.
YOUR QUOTE: " … but to suggest that because you misread something …"
The party is NOT relative to Paul stripping! The party scenario is my rendition irrelative to what Paul did or didn’t do. Therefore, I did NOT misread anything when the situation is put into context, where the bottom line is the biblical FACT that Paul stripped naked for Jesus spirit.
.
YOUR QUOTE NOT KNOWING THE ANTICS: "All of your posts, 21st, even your non-defensive ones, reveal an distinctive aggressive, combatative attitude that is never conducive to productive discoursive debate. "
Yeah, I tend to get that way when I am attacked by 5-6 atheists at one time. I was very cordial in this thread at my post #9, 29, 22, and 24. Then when dogalmighty started to have a male anatomy contest with me in his post #26, this post was the impetus of other atheists and him ganging up on the 21C! LOL. The last thing that I will accept is a bunch fo teenagers thinking they have strength in numbers to take me on. As was shown, my post #145 ended their embarrassment, and they all left to lick their wounds. LOL. What would you have done in the same scenario? Lay down, or fight back?
The irony of which I get a warning that I am not to Troll IN THE SAME MANNER AS THE OTHERS THAT WERE ATTACKING ME, HUH? At least the kids learned their lesson, but it seems they can get away with it, where if I returned fire in the same manner as they are doing to me, I would be banned? Priceless.
Anyway, you’re not like the “plethora” of teenagers that tried in vain to take me down yesterday, therefore, address my Mormon link if you will, where we can discuss it?
.
Oh fuck,
LOL
One good reason we’re like herding cats 
@21st
I may not be as sane as you assume.
There is an enormous number of things you misunderstand.
While you stridently argue specific definitions and applications for the single word “god”, a centuries old, but relatively unimportant talking point amongst atheists, you, never the less, maliciously distort and misrepresent two simple OT verses to create a ludicrous troll attack on a Christian forum that promptly fails with a prompt shutdown of discussion. With no real evidence of the outcome, you boast success.
However I guarantee you, as an ex-Christian you changed nothing and more likely only achieved a minus sum total effect.
Your aggressive MO, you boast of, does nothing but justify the obstinate resolve of theists defending their faith in the face of adversity, even against each other, as they were promised in scripture, would confront them.
You fail to understand that Christianity is the religion of persecution. They have made an art form of it. The victim card is a considerable part of their dogma. It comes as part of the territory of a crucified god.
You are just hurling rocks at a church and smashing no windows.
Again on my word as an ex-Christian, church leaders love aggressively ignorant storm troopers like you, because you do more to strengthen and consolidate the faith of the congregation than a month’s worth of bible study classes. Your convoluted puerile attacks feed their faith, not diminish it.
The Devils’s making you do God’s work. Well done.
Just to clarify:
In the OT books of Samuel it’s Saul the King, not Paul the deranged NT apostle formerly known as Saul.
It was “the Spirit of God”, JHWH and not Jesus that “was upon him”, Saul the King, and not Paul the deranged apostle.
Yes, yes its all very tedious, such a bother, but its fucking up details like this, that will convince the Christians you don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about. After all as you said yourself we have to meet these guys on their own ground. If you want them to see where they are wrong you have to be 100% right.
And this is a lousy place to have this discussion.
Peace Emily.
3 Likes
Over the years I have noticed that people who like to troll, often use the tactic of playing the victim card when called on it.
As were other posters to you, it started to change when you admitted to setting up sock puppet accounts to troll theist sites in your post 34.
You raised the bar slightly in post 41, where you dismissed the opinions of other posters here about that duplicitous trolling.
In post 44 you became slightly more aggressive towards Dogalmighty, and accused him of attacking you, rather than attacking your views, which is what he had in fact done. The first indication that you seem to struggle with the concept of debate, and especially with people disagreeing with you, which seemed very quickly to send you into something of a rage.
Then in post 47, Tin Man again pointed out your behaviour was not worthy of anyone’s approbation, which is what you seemed to have expected. The more posters who agreed with this and disagreed with your own perception of your behaviour the more angry and paranoid your responses became.
As we can see, in your response in post 50, you are lashing out indiscriminately at multiple posters, just for disagreeing with you, and saying so.
It went form bad to worse after that, and though I will hold my hand up to initially playing along, having arrived after you had started with indiscriminate ad hominem, the idea you were an innocent party “attacked by 5-6 atheists at one time” is simply not true.
As I have said since, you need to take a step back, and learn to accept people’s criticisms of your posts, that is fundamental to debate. Above all drop this arrogant aggressive persona that you and you alone know how to debate with theists, which is frankly absurd.
6 Likes
Outstanding, Sheldon. Very well said. 
1 Like
.
Sheldon,
In your response to your post #158:
First off, the downturn started with adogalmighty’s post #25 where I was cordial up to this point, and if you can’t see this, then I suggest that you make an appointment with Lenscrafter’s to get a new pair of reading glasses post haste. Then, the irony in subsequent posts is the fact that you joined in and became what you’re allegedly against!!! Priceless hypocritical action on your part.
You take the boring position of being in a “robot rut” where when you discuss a persons religion you want them to demonstrate sufficient objective evidence, and if they can’t, you disbelieve their claim, and thats it! Poof, you’re done! HELLO? lol
Take for instance the Christian faith, and using your embarrassingly weak way of discussion towards this faith, and when you reach your roadblock as described above, the pseudo-christian will always revert back to the core of their pagan belief which is the JUDEO=Christian Bible. This is where I and many others ONLY attack their faith with a take no prisoners action as you remove yourself to sit upon the sidelines.
ZEUS FORBID , we do this in various ways of either being an Atheist, a POE, working in reverse as a TRUE Christian that accepts Jesus biblically as a serial killer, abortionist, murderer of innocent children, racist, vengeful, etc., and the outcome of this position, or whatever other entity we choose, it matters not. The main concern is the end result, where every course the pseudo-christian takes in their insipid refutation, it is biblically countered with the direct and inspired words of their NAMED GOD to tie them up with no escape route using their own Bible!
You admit in your post #28 within this thread, even though it was a weak position that you used in trying to prove your point, that “you are not sure” if mentioning the name of said god has validity. Whereas in practice and knowing said Gods inspired words to use against the pseudo-christians position, is subjectively does 110 percent!
In simpler terms, you can only go so far as tiringly shown, whereas I and others either have to finish the job in your behalf, or use our initial position at the onset to do more damage than you could ever do with your described old ways modus operandi!
In closing, I can only assume that you have bathed yourself is so much circular reasoning over the years, that you are unaware that it is so much a part of you! Therefore, to use the same, you take the easy way out and are the number one user of circular reasoning on Atheist-Republic, bar none! Congratulations!
.