Huh?
Everyone is entitled to an opinion I thought.
We know, that is why your opinion is irrational, because you have claimed it is valid because there is no evidence to contradict it, again this is an argumentum ad ignorantiam fallacy, and you claimed you cared that your reasoning was rational.
So why do you keep making an irrational claim, even after it has been explined?
Again you have ignored my question, so here it is again.
Of course, but your opinion is irrational as we have explained to you exhaustively, and you claimed you cared whether your opinion was rational.
Do think you can exempt some of your opinions from the principles of logic, and still pretend you’re being rational?
Because you can’t…
Than I guess I could be considered a hard atheist not willing to accept the possibility that a heaven could exist.
1 Like
And you have personally witnessed many of us atheists constantly challenge theists on their opinions.
And opinion and a belief are basically the same thing. If they can be proven then they cease to be an opinion or belief, but evidenced fact.
1 Like
Do think you can exempt some of your opinions from the principles of logic, and still pretend you’re being rational?
Are you saying that you still don’t understand the difference between not believing in any deity, and your CLAIM that no deity exists because there is no evidence?
Still waiting for you to answers these.
If evidence?, should surface fine.
Come on ffs, do you really think you can still evade these questions, and pretend this is about your atheism? You’re being deliberately dishonest sorry, and I don’t even know why.
No there’s no evidence. There’s nothing solid that says a god doesn’t exist, but as long as there’s a lack of any kind of evidence, I still wont believe in a deity.
Do think you can exempt some of your opinions from the principles of logic, and still pretend you’re being rational?
Are you saying that you still don’t understand the difference between not believing in any deity, and your CLAIM that no deity exists because there is no evidence?
Still waiting for you to answers these.
Do you really think you can still evade these questions, and pretend this is about your atheism? You’re being deliberately dishonest sorry, and I don’t even know why.
1 Like
I already admitted there’s no evidence either way.
I am only stating now what I believe.
Are you going to keep ignoring my questions?
-
Do think you can exempt your opinions from the principles of logic, and then pretend you’re being rational?
-
Are you saying that you still don’t understand the difference between not believing in any deity, and your CLAIM that no deity exists because there is no evidence?
-
Do you really think you can still evade these questions, and pretend this is about your atheism? You’re being deliberately dishonest sorry, and I don’t even know why.
Huh?
I do not think I am exempt from that.
There’s still no evidence either way.
Honestly I just want to see proof.
Are you not feeling dizzy after spending all that time running around in circles?
The bloke’s a complete drongo.
1 Like
Well there’s neither proof of a god, or that a god doesn’t exist.
There’s more lack of evidence so that’s the direction I am going.
Right here.
Fievel, please put the pipe down.
No evidence for an opinion is exactly what the theists are doing. BEING IGNORANT.
No one is exempt from logic, but you are simultaneously making an irrational assertion that your’e certain no deity or anything supernatural exists because there is no evidence. Whilst also claiming you care whether your reasoning is rational. Yet everytime we point this out you pretend we’re objecting to your lack of belief.
Is that what I fucking asked?
As I said you’re being deliberately dishonest, you are not even trying to address your fallacious claim.
So why did you claim to know no deity exists, and why can’t you see that a claim in either direction is equally irrational, despite the fallacy being explained to you multiple times?
Ffs…
Do you or do you not understand that a lack of belief in any deity is not the same as claiming no deity exists?
Both positions would make one an atheist. You made the claim, you then defended the claim by demanding evidence or proof be provided to contradict your claim. This is a textbook logical fallacy called argumentum ad ignorantiam. Thus it is by definition irrational, something you also claim you care to avoid.
Fuck me sideways, it’s like herding cats on speed and they all have ADD.
Yes sir.
I believe I understand, but I still believe there’s no god.
There’s no proof to prove there’s no god.
But if we’re all wrong then we get to live later on.
If I am right then we go nowhere, as a soul hasn’t been proved either.
So basically a god can neither be proved or disproved… that is the point you are all trying to get across to me right?
I believe I get it now.