Fwilliem Pineapple’s New Book “Ginkoi”

Debate Room
1

Mathematician Fwillem Pineapple has released his new book called “Ginkoi” which solves the Supersymmetry problem of randomness occurring after the Big Bang.

“Ginkoi” is a set of complex formulae which accurately predict super symmetry among seemingly random objects in the universe (such as humans).

As an initial example, Pineapple presents a diagram of a baseball game and shows how all of the interactions of a baseball game can be reflected in symmetrical order. The problem of randomness appears when all possible baseball games are mapped using previous methods of supersymmetry calculations before “Ginkoi”. What happens is the entire game is reduced to twenty elements, the least of which is a “batter out” condition with no actual activity in the game (ie. the game would never be played).

When shown Pineapple’s brilliant expansion of supersymmetry calculations, a speaker in the audience insisted that they were nothing more than “reflection” transforms. Pineapple requested the audience member to “wait” as he would explain. The audience member caused a scene by insisting that “Ginkoi” was nothing more than 3rd year mathematics.

The audience member was kicked out of the lecture hall where he had been attending with his brother and sister, for his brother was enrolled in the course and was having a difficult time with the subject matter.

The audience member went to the library and found the core textbook on the subject. Convinced that the principles in “Ginkoi” boiled down to nothing more than “reflection” transforms, he returned to the lecture hall, where students were now asking questions.

I waited for the end of the lecture so as to approach Pineapple personally. Finally having a chance to speak with Pineapple, I got a better idea of what the problem was that “Ginkoi” was addressing. Pineapple suggested a situation in human history where things once assumed a very symmetrical day to day life. He then showed how a lack of symmetry evolved among humans. It gradually led to a problem not known as the “mirror” problem.

The not called “mirror” problem arises when the first human gazes upon their reflection. I explained an OBE to Pinapple involving a mirror, but the lecture was over. I urgently asked Pineapple where I could find his book. A student read off the library reference number. And it was at this point that I asked the student what year it was.

“Ginkoi” by Fwillem Pineapple will be available in paper back and hard back sometime between the years 3033 AD and 3333 AD.

3

Do you also maybe have foreknowedge of what the New York stock exchange will do?

4

WTF does super symmetry between two objects even mean?

1 Like
5

It is a description of the metaphasic state that exists between two or more pandimensional constructs that are quantum-entangeled as a consequence of applying the law of conservation of mass-energy over Planck-scale distances.

Or–to put it in another way–it seems to mean nothing.

2 Likes
6

In the realm of particle physics, supersymmetry is actually a respectable concept.

Remember that we have two classes of particles, namely fermions and bosons. Particles that comprise matter such as electrons and quarks, are fermions - they have half-integer values for the spin quantum number, and obey what are known as Fermi-Dirac statistics. This means that within in well-defined quantum system, no two fermions can share the exact same values for their quantum numbers, and this explains why electrons are arranged in shells in atoms.

Bosons, on the other hand, are particles with integer values for the spin quantum number, and are associated with forces of nature - the photon, the Higgs Boson, the W and Z bosons etc. These particles obey what are known as Bose-Einstein statistics, and multiple bosons in a well-defined quantum system can share the same values of their quantum numbers.

As an aside, it’s worth pointing out a correlation between the spin quantum number of bosons, and the nature of the forces they underpin. The Higgs Boson is associated with mass, which is a scalar physical quantity, and has spin 0. The photon, W and Z bosons all have spin 1, and are associated with vector forces - electromagnetism and the weak nuclear force. The hypothetical graviton, yet to be found but considered to be associated with gravity, has spin 2, and this is because the Einstein field equations reveal that gravity is properly a tensor force.

Indeed, in the mathematical realm of tensor, the rank of a tensor is directly related to the nature of the physical quantity being represented by that tensor. A scalar quantity is a rank 0 tensor, a vector quantity is a rank 1 tensor, and so on. The spin quantum number of a boson is therefore an indicator of the nature of the force that said boson underpins.

That diversion about bosons above aside, it’s now time to reveal the basis of supersymmetry. The observed division into fermions and bosons is considered to be the result of symmetry breaking as ambient energy density decreased after the Big Bang, just as the appearance of W and Z bosons as observably separate underpinnings of the weak nuclear force is considered to be the result of symmetry breaking of a different sort, as ambient energy density decreased. Ramp up the energy density in a particle accelerator, and the photon joins up with the W and Z bosons to underpin a unified electroweak force.

So, what happens if you ramp up the energy density still further? Sypersymmetry theory predicts that the result will be the emergence of new, partner particles to the existing ones. The currently known bosons will have fermion partners - labelled photinos, winos, zinos and higgsinos (the -ino suffix denotes these fermionic superpartners, as they’re called). Likewise, fermions will have boson partners - the selectron and squarks (these superpartners denoted by the s- prefix).

However, there’s a teensy problem with the idea of supersymmetry. Namely, we’re not able to subject it to direct experimental test at the moment.

The reason for this is that the energy density required for the supersymmetric partners, if they exist, to appear, is way beyond what our particle accelerators can reach. By, if memory serves, a factor of about 1015. A particle accelerator capable of generating that sort of energy density would have a diameter greater than the orbit of Saturn, and we’re not in a position even to build one that size, let alone operate it at full capacity.

Consequently, supersymmetry remains an interesting idea, that’s mathematically consistent with known particle physics, but separated from our ability to test it experimentally by a yawning chasm. It’s akin to string theory in this respect, which would require us to achieve even greater energy densities in a particle accelerator to test directly - at this point, we’re considering trying to build a particle accelerator that’s about a light year in diameter in order to reach that energy density.

Unless we can find another means of generating the requisite energy density that doesn’t involve building outlandishly huge machines, both supersymmetry and string theory will remain theoretical.

1 Like
7

Can we get the data from cosmic rays?

It’s my understanding that some charged particles can be accellerated over thousands of light years by the magnetic field of the galaxy itself.

I realize that there has been data obtained by cosmic ray observations in low Earth orbit, but has anyone ever put a cyclotron in space and collided subatomic particles with extremely energetic cosmic rays?