The value of comedy whilst prodigious, is hardly of any use in discerning truth, given most humour involves an innate paradox. It might work as a distraction, but nothing more. Especially since your posts suggest you have the same grasp of humour as you do of reason and logic, so it’s not much of a distraction either. Likewise whilst art is in and of itself of value, it is subjective, and cannot objectively evaluate claims beliefs or arguments.
Well there you go, a no true Scotsman fallacy.
The irony of you running straight to a logical fallacy, without even the pretence of evidencing your claim a deity exists, has a certain humour, though it’s comedic value is somewhat diluted by its predictability.