Yes, those would be nice to know. But I’m more interested in something slightly different (although of course related). I mean the title of the thread: where it talks about how there is so much of a divide(gap). I’m curious what divide/gap/(although I would guess distribution) was the OP expecting? Given nothing else to go on, it seems we are being asked to comment on a supposed gap, that is much bigger than some other supposed gap, and that this somehow need an explanation.
The whole thing sounds like a tautology; in that we are just going to keep hearing the OP demand these assumptions are true. I’m guessing we will have our intelligence attacked for questioning these assumptions. I’m guess that is why there aren’t any numbers.