Any statement spoken in truth to bring about a change, even though adverse is not a Troll (you’ll probably argue this one)
"It’s your belief, so the burden of proof is logically and epistemologically entirely yours"
And I very clearly answered that I was going to respond to and discharge the burden BUT how are we going to know that my burden has been Rightly Discharged and shifted to you, if We Do Not Have A Standard for Determining when we can both agree that the burden has passed. (You will still fight this too, infact I know you will fight the whole thing I have said as Miranda say “every word or statement you make shall be used against you” whether properly or not)
Especially as Atheist such as yourself are known to Always Change their Argument and Position, Lie and Breach every Standard of Reasonable Healthy arguments that lead to a proper and concluisive end, not an argument till eternity which is not profitable to any reasonable person but an Atheist or Satanist or Hater of Truths.
So All these big scary english was just to obtain from you what are Truths to you, Established Truths, like You can not walk through walls Truth or can you? Or you can not live in the sea as a fish or you can not fly as a bird Truth.
I Stand on Truths seen in Nature and on Natural Law, I stand on it and I will fall with it.
But you have not disclosed your own Truths and neither are you willing to commit yourself to Any Certain Ground nor do you wish to stand or fall by anything.
So how can we know that what you say is True and it should be acted upon?
And I had commited myself to answering whatever reasonable question you may profer but you are not willing to disclosed your own grounds of standing for testing and verification as you wish to do to me.
On what basis of Truths are we going to measure the validity of our cases, for the basis must be upon Truths, Natural Truths, Seen and Proven by Nature, (Like if you walk into the sea until you the water covers your natural head, for one hour, you shall die Truth) Not Lies and Imaginations and conjectures which we have seen have killed people or put them in trouble
I can see that you do not positively and directly answer a question put to you eg if i asked what is your name? Instead of answering " My name is Sheldon, You shall answer "what is my name or what do you want to do with my name or some other evasive and counter response.
If you you are using this thread to practice evasive maneuvers, you’ve done a great job and there is nothing to be gained in arguing with you.
But I think you are doing more than play evasion but you are also trying to show the weak strength of your conviction by hiding and preventing your weaknesses from being challenged, which itself, is the Proof of Weakness for it is Seen, A True Strong Man Opens Himself to Challenge Both Weakness BUT a fake and false “strong” man only shows his strength and hides his weakness, THUS, HE IS WEAK!
Whilst the Christians Are Always Ready for a Challenge Anywhere, Anytime, day or night you have to adequately prepare ensuring that the circumstance is favourable to you (meaning there should be some chances to cheat and play unfair).
For your convictions can never be established on a fair fight, which is why you are not willing to commit, even when I have clearly asked you to lay the rules of engagement, so that I would show The World, that your convictions are founded on a Lie and not On Truths!
But you love to make a contention out of a contention and in the end, many words fly all over the place and nothing is resolved.
I am sorry I do not participate in vain arguments and arguments to eternity.
For if you asked me, bonafide, what is my name, I would clearly answer you Joygirl.
I am Done here. Have fun with Your Forums
“prove“ that the molecules of Hydrogen and Oxygen have intelligence? I mean why else “would these guys get together?”
YOU said “tits”
- personally, I wouldn’t brag about it. Beside the buybull is all human thought - you haven’t freed yourself from anything.