Why do people think Science supposedly requires belief?

[GodBennett]

@Sheldon

You assigned a claim to me I hadn’t made, after I called you on your original false claim. I asked you to quote one poster here who’d made such a claim, and you linked my post.

I exposed your lie by quoting my original post verbatim, you responded by doubling down on your mendacity, and using edited quotes from my post. You then dishonestly tried to move the goal posts by citing a different claim you’d made, but one that still misrepresented what I had said.

Stop pretending to be a god, and try being a man, and admit I never claimed or implied that scientific truths needed people to believe them in order to be held as true.

@GodBennett

You must reasonably see by now, that if humans are known to interact with reality to construct Science, and you claim humans need belief to interact with said reality, that the same belief that you claim is required for reality’s interaction, is a requirement for Scientific trueness’ construction

No, this is still a grossly dishonest misrepresentation of what I said, and your duplicity increases each time you attempt to pretend otherwise. You’ve even altered the claim a third time now, pathetically dishonest.

You’re constantly mentioning that I have supposedly lied, but you are yet to address that no such lie was told in contrast, where instead your early words confirm clearly, my prior expression.

Simply put:

1. You originally said “We [ need beliefs ] to interact with reality.” (As I quote you here)

• If you scroll back, notice what I say now, has not changed since my original response.

2. I pointed out that humans interact with the same reality above, to construct Scientific trueness.

3. It should be clear to anyone here, that you are saying that humans need belief in order for Science to hold true.

How else would Science hold true by your initial words, if humans cannot interact with reality (to conduct Science/construct Science’s trueness) without belief?

Please address the above question, rather than continue to make claims, while failing to substantiate your claims of my supposed dishonesty with links to those so called comments of mine.