An interesting thought. So true freedom of speech and religion are mutually exclusive, as religion always limits freedom by doctrine and dogma. I would try to state it like this: You can only have one highest principle: If it is freedom than religion can’t be on top. If your highest principle is a religion than freedom comes on second place at best (history shows that usually freedom comes at a much lower position for religious people). Furthermore, if you choose freedom as the highest principle, all other principles have to stand behind? I wonder how a society with such “radical” freedom would look like…