Well, welcome to the most boring fucking conversation of all time.
Why is so wrong to ask for a simple conversation without the caveats of logical argument being thrown in.
Yes, theist cannot prove their notions, they cannot even form a coherent logical argument without invoking various fallacies… we’ve seen it a million times.
Like wise, we (atheists) have to tread some ridiculous fucking line where we have to state “we’re not convinced by the proposition” again, because of sodding logical argument.
Why is it so unreasonable to have an adult conversation?
I’m more interested in why someone believes or disbelives, how did they come to that conclusion? What would shake their doubts or beliefs?
Fuck, no wonder I rarely come on here.