Do you have anything other than unsupported blind assertions to offer?
You can start by providing something resembling genuine evidence that your cartoon magic man actually exists. “My favourite Bronze Age mythology says so” isn’t “evidence” for your cartoon magic man, it’s evidence for the propensity of the authors thereof to make shit up, such as that hilarious nonsense about genetics being controlled by coloured sticks.
Indeed, you might want to ask yourself why any genuinely existing god type entity would allow itself to be associated with nonsense of this sort, in the light of the additional assertion that your cartoon magic man purportedly possesses “perfect foreknowledge” of the future. As a corollary of that assertion, said entity would therefore have known in advance that this, and other nonsense assertions contained within the pages of your sad little Bronze Age mythology, would be utterly destroyed by modern scientific discoveries.
It’s a bit difficult to believe that your mythology was either “divinely inspired”, or even more amazingly, the direct product of a fantastically gifted magic entity, when said mythology contains so many assertions about the observable universe and its contents that are demonstrably wrong.
The whole of Genesis 1 is a farce, for example. Earth purportedly “created” before the Sun? Astrophysicists have know for decades that this is ass-backwards, and that planets are formed by accretion after their parent stars. We now have space telescope imagery of the process in varying stages of completion taking place right now in other parts of the galaxy.
For that matter, we know that the Solar System isn’t unique - other stars with collections of planets orbiting them have been known for nearly two decades. The idea that Earth is somehow “special” died a death with Copernicus, let alone the discoveries of modern astronomy and astrophysics.
The assertion that plants were purportedly “created” before the Sun existed to power photosynthesis, is again hilariously absurd. Not only had the Sun appeared on the scene before the other Solar System bodies, but the first photosynthesising organisms weren’t even plants, they were cyanobacteria. We have fossil stromatolites in Western Australia dating back 3.5 billion years, that are identical morphologically to present day stromatolites.
The first organisms that could be considered “plants” didn’t put in an appearance until around 1.2 billion years ago, which was the time that Bangiomorpha pubescens appears in the fossil record.
Your mythology also has the appearance of vertebrate taxa completely arse about face. Your mythology asserts that whales appeared before land animals, again an assertion known to be hilariously wrong. Whales didn’t appear until the Eocene, while the first land animals date back 300 million years earlier to the late Devonian. Even other mammals pre-date whales by up to 100 million years - Castorocauda, a sort of monotreme analogue of modern beavers, was alive in the Jurassic era.
Likewise, birds appeared in the late Jurassic, around 200 million years after the first land animals.
Indeed, the only organisms that are even mentioned in your mythology, are either vertebrates, insects or the odd marine crustaceans and molluscs. Something like forty entire Phyla of eukaryotes alone are absent entirely from your mythology, not to mention the entire Domains of Archaea and Eubacteria.
If you think the above litany of absurd errors was the product of a fantastically gifted magic entity, then either said entity left its brain in the toilet cubicle when it chose Bronze Age nomads to scribble the mythology in question, or you need to get out more and learn something about reality. Because the FACTS destroy any pretence that your mythology is something other than bad fiction concocted by piss-stained nomads.
As for the diseased fantasy that is the “global flood”, don’t even think of trying to prop up that cretinous bilge, because you’ll have a very bad time here once the FACTS destroying that nonsense are brought here in any quantity.
Oh, and don’t try hand-waving any of this away with fatuous appeals to the merely asserted “supernatural” (otherwise known as magic), because those of us who paid attention in class will simply laugh at your feeble apologetics.
