Thank you for clarifying this, as you’ve explained something that I’ve been curious about.
I have often listened to apologist’s Youtube videos, and they often (I’m tempted to say “always”) mention the opinions of people who are “doctors” who have a Ph.D in something, ie: ". . . Dr. Stein, a biologist who graduated from Western with his Ph.D in molecular biology says . . . " and then onward into the nonsense, or how there are a large percentage of “doctors” who believe in God, and so forth.
In my mind (and my perceptions may be flawed because I’m autistic), this constant mention of credentials detracts from rather than adds to credibility, because if these ideas had any validity, they could stand on their own.
I’m not saying that academic accomplishments are meaningless . . . just that valid ideas don’t need a constant stream of reminders of the education of the interlocutor to prop them up.
When I was a paramedic (and I’m now an RN), I don’t need to constantly remind my patients of my licensure in order to treat them . . . unless they have Alzheimer’s.