What straw man, that’s just bizarre? This is just tit for tat rhetoric I assume. Oh and for the second time @CyberLN offered that as one POSSIBLE criterion, nor did she insist it was necessary, HERE:
Here’s a few: is it measurable, is it repeatable, is it verifiable?
Well there you go, the straw man here is yours it seems, how ironic. You also insisted on a criteria before you’d offer your elusive magic beans, then when it was offered ignored it with this tedious red herring about Spartacus again.
Clearly things can be true, real yet do not offer the luxury of “repeatability”.
Clearly, but since @CyberLN (nor anyone else) suggested otherwise, this appears to be another straw man, and the irony is now getting pretty think.