Not quite, I’m actually demonstrating to any casual visitor here that the atheists don’t know what they’re talking about.
Ahh yes, we must get back to ad hominem when reasoned discourse is too much of a challenge.
Feel free to disagree with any statements I make about mathematics, theoretical physics, general relativity, metaphysics, philosophy, rationalism, the history of science, computing, electrical engineering, radio, astronomy, cosmology, programming language design, the Bible, ancient history etc - you are at liberty to disagree and where I’m clearly in error I will thank you and apologize.
In fact now’s your chance, take any statement (and its context) that I’ve made across this range of topics and if you think I said something untrue just say so.
As for evidence for God I have some, but no atheist (with a single notable exception) has been man enough to just say how they would distinguish evidence from non-evidence, and none have even attempted to convince me they’d do nothing more than just say “Nah, not evidence. Nope, No, Nah, Nope not evidence, keep trying, no, nope, nah” over and over - how can we avoid that? I hope you’ll agree that such a back and forth would achieve nothing, prove nothing, settle nothing - that’s why I don’t offer you a plate with the evidence on it.