Theist derision of science

That’s a lie, and you asked people to quote you verbatim if they disagreed I gave three examples, and you paraphrased one of them mendaciously, after crying that @CyberLN had done this to you, your hypocrisy is being laid bare here. Here is your post:

Now here was my first example, that you have ignored of course quelle surprise.

Here is my second example that you ignored:

As for your lie that you had not paraphrased me lets expose that then:

My response there verbatim, and now here is yours:

So you changed my challenge to your claim that it was scientifically justified being dubious, because there is not a scientific consensus to support it, to a dishonest straw man claim that no one can be right or justified in challenging a consensus, which I never remotely said. So a rather silly lie on top of your duplicitous straw man.