Just so.
There is also a broad but accurate rule of thumb about conspiracies. The more people who know about them the greater the chance the conspiracy will become public and fail.
Our little friend has just indulged in a common form of circular logic used by to prove conspiracy.
ME? As a general principle, I don’t believe any conspiracy I’ve seen posted in the public arena. Due to alack of empirical evidence. I do believe in vested interests acting in self interests . EG Big tobacco, big pharm, car makers, politicians as a group.
Governments always have secrets. That’s the nature of politics, but not clear evidence for conspiracies (such as say area was 51)
It’s my perception that conspiracies tend to be posited by the powerless in attempt to get power. They don’t work because they are not evidence based. That’s probably bit too kind. Conspiracy theorist I’ve met tend to be quite paranoid and a bit loopy. You know, like our little friend and the paranoid drivel he’s been posting to support a crackpot fringe book