I neither like nor dislike your posts, they’re just very poorly reasoned, and use closed minded rhetoric. However this kind of ad hominem, using a poisoning of the well fallacy will be challenged every time, as will all irrational assertions. You could try addressing the actual content of my posts, beyond that the kind of unevidenced sweeping rhetoric you have posted so far, is also always going to be challenged. It would be closed minded bias to challenge it from religious apologists, and then give it a pass from an atheist.
For example, you claimed to:
- know that no deity exists.
- You also claimed to know there never would be any evidence for any deity.
Care to explain how you know those things, as the first is an unfalsifiable claim, and when I asked you if you knew what unfalsifiable meant, you ignored me. It goes without saying that I don’t believe anyone can know the future, yet you claimed to in that second assertion, was this an error resulting from hubris? If so why not just admit it, and try not to make such sweeping absolute claims in the future, as it is indicative of poor reasoning. from a closed mind.