If you need A.I. to defend your thesis it means that you are completely out of arguments in the debate.
Btw, i did what he requested and asked Chatgpt:
“is the fact that the numbers 3,6,9 appear several times in mathematics a proof of God?”
To which, it replied:
"The recurring appearance of certain numbers like 3, 6, and 9 in mathematics doesn’t constitute proof of God, at least in a scientific or mathematical sense. In mathematics, these numbers appear in various contexts due to their inherent properties or because of the systems and structures we use to describe the world.
For example:
- The number 3 is significant in many aspects of geometry (like triangles), number theory, and is considered a symbol of balance and harmony in various cultures.
- 6 is the first perfect number, meaning it is the sum of its divisors (1, 2, and 3), and it appears in many places like hexagonal symmetry in nature.
- 9 often shows up in patterns like the sum of the digits of multiples of 9 always adding up to 9, or in the properties of numbers (like multiples of 9 being related to modular arithmetic).
The question of whether this implies a “proof of God” is more philosophical or theological. Some people interpret patterns in nature and mathematics as evidence of a divine creator or design, but these are personal or religious interpretations rather than objective mathematical proofs.
Mathematics itself is a tool used to describe the patterns and structures observed in the universe, and its discoveries are not typically framed as evidence of supernatural influence. They tend to be seen as part of the natural order that can be explained through logical reasoning and empirical evidence."
So yeah, even the A.I. says that the so called proof is wrong; not that this changes anything anyway since it was already wrong from the start without any need for Chatgpt to say so.