The possibility of an observable physical "god"

[Sheldon]

@Matthew, If you use the quote function by highlighting text, then selecting the quote icon that appears, we will know who you are responding to, and specifically what about.

@Matthew

I was suggesting that if you can provide evidence to the contrary of a biological being which is the universe that would be sufficient enough evidence to dispute my claim.

I just quoted your original claim? This looks nothing like it, nor does it address the fact the claim seems unfalsifiable, do you know what unfalsifiable means?

@Matthew

I would argue that is sufficient enough evidence against any claim of any god.

Great, except countless deities have been imagined that are not premised as biological entities, but supernatural ones, and you need to present that argument, try a simple syllogism as a starting point.

@Matthew

On the comparison of religious peoples beliefs and how they’re conected to the behaviors and needs for survival. That has been sufficiently proven

I don’t believe you, please offer something to support your assertion? Perhaps a citation, and it’s just a suggestion, but you might want to stop using words like proof and proved, for words like evidenced. Proofs are either mathematical or logical, so unless you’re claiming to have a mathematical or logical proof, it just seems like misplaced hubris.

@Matthew

I dont believe in this claim and am wholeheartedly an atheist.

What claim? Everyone knows you’re an atheist, it’s in your profile. All one need do is click on any username to know if someone has identified as an atheist, theists or agnostic.

@Matthew

I am attempting this because that is what science calls for.

You are claiming to know what the whole of science calls for? I wasn’t aware of any serious scientific research into disproving deities, and again it is an unfalsifiable claim, and these are by definition unscientific.

@Matthew

We are fairly certain that the universe only holds physical matter.

Who is we? Not having evidence for the existence of something, and knowing that it does not exist, are not the same, there is an epistemological burden of proof to a claim, and the lack of a belief, is not a claim.

@Matthew

Now on to me addressing your response. I’ll map out what this “god” would look like as all its parts.

That is entirely moot, since your claim:

@Matthew

will definitively prove that…no god of anykind exist.

Encompasses any possible notion of deity, now are you going to “prove” this claim?

@Matthew

there is no such thing as the supernatural.

Again a claim, again no attempt to evidence it?

@Matthew

I would hope you agree with this.

No I don’t agree, I already stated that I think the claim is unfalsifiable, and that I disbelieve all unfalsifiable claims. Do you understand what an unfalsifiable claim is, and what this rationally infers?

One more suggestion, try not to post walls of texts like that, and quote specific parts of posts you are responding to, it makes your posts much easier to read, and the context much easier to understand. Especially for third parties.