You have been TOLD REPEATEDLY that this is NOT A "LFELESS UNIVERSE!
Planet Earth plays host to trillions of living organisms, including at the last count, over 8 billion humans.
You canāt even peddle your fatuous strawman caricatures competently, can you?
Are you going to LEARN RELEVANT FACTS at some point in your miserable life?
Ooh, itās projection time again, folks!
Bare faced lie. Apparently youāve failed to notice tne numerous occasions when people have provided rigorously obtained evidence to support their statements, A task youāve never even attemtpted.
As succinct an encapsulation of your output as one could wish for.
For which we have evidence. The part you keep forgetting.
Which only appear after living organisms capable of experiencing the requisite emotions emerge. What part of this elementary concept tdo you keep failing to understand?
Once again, itās of benefit to the living organisms in question when they emerge.
Can you put this canard of your into the fucking bin once and for all?
They are of manifest benefit to the requisite living organisms. Once again, are you going to put this canard of yours in the fucking bin where it belongs?
Stop being fucking disingenuous.
Itās not the āuniverseā that benefits, but the living organisms residing therein.
Can you shove this canard into the fucking bin once and for all?
You have been TOLD REPEATEDLY that none of this implies that āpurposeā and āmeaningā are intrinsic parts of the fabric of the universe.
Are you going to shove this apologetic duplicity of yours into the fucking bin where it belongs?
Iāve presented here an entire document expounding the evidence for the evolutionary and biological basis of ethical behaviour, and heās completely ignored it. so heāll probably ignore your evidence as well.
Weāre not dealing with an honest participant in discourse, weāre dealing with a wilful liar for doctrine. One who wilfully and deliberately misrepresents properly constructed postulates, and twists them for mendacious apologetic ends. His only value here is to provide a useful example of mythology fanboy duplicity.
Indeed, I donāt post for his benefit, because I know it will be wasted upon him. I post for the benefit of the people who paid attention in claass, so that they can see that canards and outright lies do not pass here unchallenged.
Weāve already had another thread here, in which a ducplicitous mythology fanboy demanded that we provide him with a centuryās worth of scientific research, condensed into a two minute soundbite, in order to have ācredibilityā, but who, if pressed on the matter, will almost certainly demand that we treat āmy mythology says soā as āevidenceā for his cartoon magic man. The rampant and fulminating dishonesty endemic to mythology fanboyism stinks like a blocked drain full of amputated animal parts.
The peons who peddle this garbage, manifestly do not possess the functioning neurons required to conduct even elementary levels of proper discourse, let alone anything involving advanced topics such as prebiotic chemistry or cosmological physics. Yet on the basis of a sleazy combination of wilful ignorance and even more wilful mendacity, they think that their bad anaolgies, ex recto fabrications, strawman caricatures and instances of snide condescension, purportedly constitute valid critique of 200 years or more of diligent scientific endeavour. I wouldnāt trust these people to shovel shit from point A to point B unless they were supervised by armed guards.
And as for all the pious and sanctimonius talk of āmoralityā emanating from these people, oh please, this stopped being even a sad joke years ago. Most of the mythology fanboys I encounter wouldnāt recognise genuine morality if it dropped JDAMs on them from 40,000 feet. The stench of malfeasance emanating from these specimens is on a par with organotellurium compounds, and trust me, you never want to expose yourself to those in a laboratory if you can help it.