Doesn’t sound like much of a university to be honest.
Only if you presuppose there is a why? I personally try not to reason by making unevidenced presuppositions. How is much easier to answer, again just research how solar systems are formed, and you have an example of at least one that has formed in this way. You are asking why and how a hole exactly fits the puddle in it, the errancy of this reasooning has already been explained to you, but you seem unwilling to acknowledge this.
The existence of everything for it to be lucky is obje ctive fact, what we have no objective evidence for is any purpose behind it, and you haven’t even the integrity to acknowledge requests you demonstrate some objective evidence for this “purpose” you are presupposing.
Or you have the irony impairment, that seems to be quite common among many religious apologists.
I shan’t even feign surprise you have again returned to preach, and again failed to address any of the objections to your verbiage.
It was so obviously meant as irony, that I am starting to think @Soldier4christ is simply trolling. He does not seem interested in honest debate.